• arglebargle
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 months ago

    Vivaldi

    So re-badged Chromium with closed source changes. Dependent on the upstream chromium. Doesnt seem like a good idea to me.

    • R0cket_M00se
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      How do you know it’s dependent? Cant anyone make a fork of the engine?

      • arglebargle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        It isnt a fork though, its just built on top of. Which is probably smarter than a fork, they dont have to do all that other work. It is interesting that the web hints and the user agent now say Chrome in the vavaldi reporting. At least I think it did: search for “what is my user agent” and it will tell you.

        • R0cket_M00se
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          I’m not sure I did exactly what you intended but I searched it in the address/search bar and it gives me this output.

          “Your user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/114.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Vivaldi/6.1.3035.257”

            • R0cket_M00se
              link
              fedilink
              English
              111 months ago

              At first I thought I did it wrong, since I got an output for basically every browser engine on the market. Does the order matter? I’m just a network engineer I don’t know much about systems beyond building hardware and installing/managing Windows and some PnP Linux Distros.

              • arglebargle
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I should have directed you here: https://www.whatsmybrowser.org

                or use whatever search result you want for “what browser am i using”. It will tell you what I was trying to demonstrate.

                No order does not matter, in the first thing we did it simply is announcing that it is capable to handle requests as if it was any of those browsers/versions. This second link is more to to the point.

                Still, if you are happy with it, fine. I just find it somewhat depressing/worrysome that there are basically 2 choices no matter what browser you choose: Chrome (or webkit based) and Firefox. That is it. (Well ok or Safari. KHTML based - which was a fork of KDE’s Konqueror. )