• @reallynotnick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Even if they lie requiring X months would at least put a cap on how many they could own since there are only 12 months in the year.

        • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Iirc primary residency is already living in a single home more than 6 months out of a year, or where you lived the majority of the time

          • @reallynotnick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            True I guess I was reading more into the original comment on taxing more than appreciation and such. I know there are tax benefits to primary residence already, which maybe covers their original idea, but I figured it would be even higher taxes for foreigners for non-primary residence or something was what they were suggesting.

      • @andrewta@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Technically true but want to guess how many realtors buy a house , homestead the place for a couple of years then sell it?

        Hint: the number is a lot higher then people might think.

        There are a lot of ways to get around problems just by thinking outside of the box. Might it slow down the problem? Maybe.

        • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          So they’re buying a new house every few years and selling the old one? If they have only one house at a time, I don’t really care much. The issue is when billion dollar corporations buy up single family homes to rent out, not an individual buying a house to live in and sell it in a few years

    • @Muddobbers
      link
      511 months ago

      Utility usage? Pull up the last 6 months of, like, water use (since you need to have water so it’s a solid metric).