Dammit, lol. Autocorrect got me and I didn’t notice.

Occam’s Razor is that the simplest answer is probably right.

You’re thinking of Hanson’s razor which states:

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

I will never give this useless fuck any excuse for the intentional murder he committed.

he can’t properly identify risks.

Give me a fucking break.

Is there an OLED tv on the market now that doesn’t just exist to sell ads?

110% right. What a stupid article.

No matter how clear your law is, if SCOTUS doesn’t like it, they can just declare it unconstitutional after the first yahoo with standing sues the government.

How do you propose they parent other people’s kids?

But if you make another hole upstream, how do you allow that to heal? It’d be extra holes all the way down up.

If Ukraine actually did assassinate Tucker, I’d only support them more.

Also would have accepted the rare double contraction “shouldn’t’ve.”

Since when do GOP senators care about what’s “moral?”

Nothing I have done in my career has given me even close to the benefit I got from learning Haskell. I don’t get to use it professionally, but the patterns I learned to recognize in Haskell are everywhere.

maybe this is because I’ve never played a Zelda game

Definitely not it. BotW is a great game, but it’s not a Zelda game. That’s my beef with it and TotK.

I don’t want to hear what Epic has to say about my dog’s shit.

^Low key the changes do seem pretty shit if the reporting is accurate^

This is a really interesting train of thought!

I don’t mean to belittle the actual, real questions here, but I can’t shake the hilarious image of 2 dudes sitting around in a basement, stoned out of their minds getting “deep.”

Bro! What if consciousness isn’t real, and we’re just faking it

I get asked to prove I’m making a legit login attempt all the time because it’s from a new IP address. 23andMe could have implemented something similar, and given the sensitive nature of the data they host and given how we all know that people can’t be trusted to have good password hygiene, I think they should have been required to do so.

IMO this whole thing is just more proof that we need better regulation around how companies treat users’ private information.

Wait. If a company breaks the law, you can punish the people in charge instead of just fining the company an insignificant sum? Are you sure?

Was the payout actually from campaign funds? I thought the problem was that it wasnt and that the money needed to be reported as a campaign contribution because keeping it quiet was obviously for the benefit of the campaign.

Aka good news for almost everyone.