Futility is resistant

  • 2 Posts
  • 907 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle






  • This might surprise many, but unit tests weren’t common a couple of decades ago, even if professional code bases. You just had to design your architecture so it was resilient, structure your code so it had as few secondary effects as possible, and manually test throughly. It was frowned upon to test superficially or “moving fast and breaking things”.

    I know, boring, but the end result usually was rock solid, there were no “we’ll patch it later” opportunities.










  • TeamAssimilationtoNews@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago
    1. The enemy is both weak and strong. “[…] the followers must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”

    Umberto Eco, The 14 Points of Fascism.



  • To anyone who interacts with it? Would you deny that a program automate mental labor in the same way that a sawmill automates manual labor? Isn’t that some degree of intelligence?

    Now, we have very imperfect LLMs who nevertheless can be instructed not with program code, but actual natural language, and they react accordingly. Isn’t that also intelligence? Computers that understood natural language was the realm of science fiction just five years ago.

    I get it that people hate LLMs, both because how idiots use them, and how corporations push them everywhere; but not recognizing the intelligence in those programs is naive at best.