• 0 Posts
  • 2 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 25th, 2023

help-circle
  • Gonna rank them because why not?

    1. Kirk: Was looking really good until he tore his Achilles. He doesn’t do anything special, but he does the right things consistently and decisively, which when you have the Vikings’ weapons is exactly what you want.

    2. Goff: A slightly above average QB who is more of a product of his environment than a real difference maker. In the rare games where he’s pressured and forced to make tough plays, you start to see him look more like the Rams version. With that great OL and playcalling he doesn’t have to deal with that much.

    3. Love: Talented but flawed with plenty of inconsistency. He definitely shows flashes of his talent, and has been playing really well the last few games. Looking at the season as a whole though, he’s had some bad stretches too. At worst, I think he’s probably a below-average starter, but if he can clean things up he could easily push top-10.

    4. Fields: Insanely talented but very frustrating. In terms of arm talent and athleticism, there’s maybe 5 QBs more gifted than Fields. There is practically nothing on the field he can’t do physically. That being said, there’s also not a WR he can’t miss wildly, a read he can’t blow, or a silly pick he can’t throw.


  • Packer fan opinion here, so take it with a grain of salt I guess. I think not taking a QB at 1 would be a huge mistake. Fields is out of contract after next season, and I really don’t think he’s shown anywhere near enough to be seen as the QB of the future. Williams or Maye would have 3-4 years to develop with most likely a new coach at the helm. Use pick 4 on a tackle so the protection should hopefully be good for them in those years. I get the MHJ talks, but I really don’t think the pass catchers are that big of an issue. Moore is a legit WR1, and they have more than enough cap space and draft capital to get a WR2 in the building in the offseason.