In germany in the 18th/19th century there was the extreme duelling form of “übers Sacktuch schießen” where both duellists stood very close (both gripping the same cloth) and were shooting at the same time with pistols, but only one was loaded. Since the distance was so close, missing was impossible and only random chance decided the winner/survivor.

Wer mit Widerspruch nicht umgehen kann, hat als demokratische Führungsfigur keine gute Perspektive. Viele Entscheidungen können kritisiert werden, und wer seine großen Entscheidungen nicht klar begründet, überlässt seinen Kritikern die öffentliche Deutungshoheit.

Völlig unangemessen finde ich die Idee, bei Kritik bockig zu werden (der undankbare Pöbel soll mehr schuften und weniger nörgeln!) oder im Selbstmitleid zu versinken (nie hat ein Kanzler vor mir sowas ertragen müssen!).

Ein Bundeskanzler ist kein Kaiser auf Zeit, sondern ein Gestalter und Vermittler innerhalb seiner Regierungsperiode. Und dieses demokratische Bild sollte ein Kanzler auch dem Wahlvolk vermitteln können.

I can see the allure because it implies that every conflict could become life-threatening, therefore everybody should weigh their words carefully.

In reality though it would emphasize the weight of trained duellists higher than those with well-informed convictions. If you cannot speak the truth because well-paid professional duellists could suppress you anytime by threat of duel (or shame of declining it).

There is a good reason why pretty much every modern civilization stopped this practise: Too much was needlessly lost (see Hamilton, Fermat, many students in the 18th century Europe…).

“I cannot be held responsible for what my goons were ordered to do! “ (Mr. Burns, the Simpsons)

“Little brother is watching you!”

Each Flock camera contains 2 GB of RAM and reportedly at least 1 gram of gold. Recycling them is important…

Conservatives (Germany ca. 1933): Hitler will only throw the enemies of the German people in jail, so I’m safe. Gestapo, some time later at their door: Hallo. Conservatives: Oh no, who could have seen this coming?

Moral of the story: The leopard bites every face.

Since polymarket (& friends) is now somehow legal gambling (due to its political connections), one could bet against the event of flock cameras suddenly failing, and then somehow lose that bet due to unforeseen incidents…

The community allows for the accumulation of wealth by providing services, security and labor. Therefore the community is entitled to a portion of the accumulated wealth in form of taxation.

No man is an island, and nobody becomes a billionaire from their own labor. Community matters.

Because in here, Calvins can show his deep expertise in dinosaurs. Out there, he’s just some nerd kid that doesn’t really fit in.

Pattison could convincingly play a tie.

It’s easy to remember him in his Twilight sparkle-vampire role, but he actually has shown great range in his other roles - I loved his performances in the Odyssey and the Lighthouse.

But there is still a management bonus for this quarter - right?

I tolerate both steam and heroic. I can see how a launcher is useful for centralized library management (updates and reinstallation), but I also see how it is a lot of concentrated attention and potential adspace / datamining tool.

I tolerate steam because they have good features & an okay track record, and heroic because I want to receive the free epic games but do not want to give them real estate on my pc.

Resell to the next data center project, Re-steal it from there afterwards. Infinite money pump glitch!

Yes, when employed properly it can be a helpful tool. But when it’s given all the house keys and unlimited leeway, it will burn down your house (and your budget) because it cannot make reasonable choices. It’s not sentient (yet), despite all the promises from AI evangelists.

If this is a literal license to kill for the police - who is the intended target? Does the RN plan to use it for their future coup, or is it meant for “regular” civic protesters that then retroactively become terrorists once shot?

Steam on pc shows that gamers can be okay with not having physical media - as long as they trust the vendor that the thing they pay for actually means a persistent access to the game.

Unfortunately this move also gives much more power to the vendor. Once he decides to withdraw access to the player, the ownership of the paid-for thing becomes useless (until a lawsuit were to be filed and won).

Physical media without mandatory internet servers (like in pre-internet consoles) means true ownership - after buying a game, the vendor has no longer any control.

The key point to me is not directly the difference between physical disk or cloud download, but between truly offline versus online-required games (or goods in general).