phreekno@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 4 months agoStudy calls US infrastructure spending a "climate time bomb"www.motherjones.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1196arrow-down110
arrow-up1186arrow-down1external-linkStudy calls US infrastructure spending a "climate time bomb"www.motherjones.comphreekno@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squarethisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down13·4 months agoThe US doesn’t really need more infrastructure. It needs to de-infrastructure. Fewer bridges, and roads. Create large national parks, where development is not allowed.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-24 months agoI have some good news: those national parks were created over a century ago. The US doesn’t have a problem with having large tracts of undeveloped space.
minus-squareroot_beer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoState of Nevada: “Am I a joke to you?”
minus-squareafraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoWould it make you feel better that the people running Arizona’s infrastructure are the worst shitheads I have ever dealt with in my career?
The US doesn’t really need more infrastructure. It needs to de-infrastructure. Fewer bridges, and roads. Create large national parks, where development is not allowed.
I have some good news: those national parks were created over a century ago.
The US doesn’t have a problem with having large tracts of undeveloped space.
State of Nevada: “Am I a joke to you?”
Would it make you feel better that the people running Arizona’s infrastructure are the worst shitheads I have ever dealt with in my career?