• herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I love this, but I suspect that the average person will see the last one and think, “Perfect! An orderly lawn and less insects.”

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      More time and effort. Bottom one takes 30 minutes to mow every 2 weeks. Each and everyone of those plants need to be maintained, trimmed and kept with weekly so it doesn’t look like a disaster. So unless you have 1-2 free hours a day, no one will be actually able to do the top and maintain it so it doesn’t turn to garbage.

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You mean “so it doesn’t turn to nature”. You just think nature is garbage.

          • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Personally I respect nature, but don’t like it to be near me. So I prefer to live in places without lawns, like apartments. If I found myself by some miracle in possession of a house with a lawn (in this economy???), I would seek to destroy the lawn and replace it with more house. House is much more useful than lawn. Until I had accomplished that goal, it would just be a useless mass and I wouldn’t waste any time on it except to keep the footpath clear.

            The way white people are like “I want to be responsible for additional household chores so that I can have a useless biological dead zone that ‘looks nice’” is nonsense to me.

              • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I hate to break this to you but lawns were invented by European aristocrats.

                • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  TIL having a lawn makes you white.

                  If you wanted to slag off aristocracy you could’ve done that without making it a race thing though.

      • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s not true for one simple reason: we need to plan NATIVE plants! They require near no maintainence and do extremely well.

        All the shit you can buy from a garden store is almost always non natives that weve all been tricked into thinking is somehow better. They aren’t. They suck for the ecosystem and they suck to take care of.

        There is no care with native plants. There is only beautiful growth and a healthy ecosystem.

        Plant. Native.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          lol must be great living in a fair weather state where stuff doesn’t die every frost.

          That I’m works for places that can leave bulbs in the ground, lots of people need to remove even native bulbs since the frosts get too hard and will kill most of them.

          Native doesn’t mean zero maintenance, who told you that lmfao? It still requires maintenance if you don’t want it looking like garbage. Beauty is subjective, but yeah lack of maintenance is just laziness and claiming it’s beautiful is justifying the not wanting to deal with it.

          Native yards still need maintenance, flowers need to be deadheaded weekly while blooming for example. No one talks about the finer details, just glosses over how “simple” it is. Yeah if you let turn to shit it’s easy lmfao.

          • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Dunno what “natives” you’re planting, but if you have a true native landscape, there’s very little maintenance. You just have to work with the right people (i.e. - not landscapers) to help select a true low-maintenance, lawn. If you plant the right mix, you can have a really nice looking lawn that has different native flowering plants throughout the growing season and will look really nice.

            If you’re spending hours a day, or even hours a week, you probably want a very specific, manicured look. Or you didn’t do the right planting mix.

            https://www.prairiemoon.com/ is a great resource for this stuff.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Native plants still need to be deadheaded, still need to be pruned and trimmed.

              Native plants still require maintenance, they just have better synthesis with the other plants.

              The time is for the amount of plants. Yeah having 4 plants in a small yard is easy work, but 4 plants in a large yard would look barren and empty… so more plants, more work. If 4 plants are 5 minutes of work a week, 40 plants is 50 minutes. For a similar yard of turf it would be 30 minutes of mowing. Now you have to maintain your grass, can’t mow since it’s not all turf, and still need to deal with the additional plants. It’s x+y, not x or y….

              People who buy into this “native is easier” is being sold a bridge that requires more work down the road if they don’t want it to look like shit. For a few years it’s fine, and why every rants about it, because it hasn’t reached the issue point yet. Native plants thrive more, or should, meaning they require more work since they you know, grow and spread easier….

              • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                You’re uneducated on the topic and talking like you have all the facts. I have a large property that looks like the top image, and it’s extremely low maintenance compared to a manicured lawn. I don’t have to dead-head flowers, because they’re incorporated into a larger planting, so it looks perfectly natural to have a few flowers in multiple stages of their lifecycle along side the rest of the property. NORMAL nature looks beautiful and not messy.

                Sure, if you have a row of “native” flowers in a bed of mulch, they take maintenance. In that case, don’t have a native lawn, you have a few native plants in an unnatural ecosystem.

                Natives are easier, much lower maintenance, better for the environment, and look much better unless you’re used to flat, green, golf courses.

                • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  What’s so magical about native plants that you think they don’t require the same regular maintenance of any other plants?

                  If you don’t dead head, those seeds will blow all over your yard, meaning you need to weed them, or your yard is a mess since it’s all over the place. Or the plants get so dense are competing with each other chocking each other out. I’m sorry this was never properly explained to you.

                  People sell “native” yards to people who think they can neglect their yards. Theres a reason why they don’t show established yards in their marketing lmfao.

          • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I very much live in a cold climate with a deep frost, it’s totally not a problem. Because the native plants are used to it! For many ifs part of their lifecycle: the seeds require the cold cycle before they will germinate. Very cool stuff.

            You don’t need to deadhead your flowers: only if you’re looking to extend the flowering time. Otherwise just let them do their thing. They’ll flowers, then make seeds, and those seeds will contribute to the ecosystem.

            If you like, you can give me a rough region you’re in (like a state and part of the state) and the conditions of the yard you’re struggling with (dry/wet, sun conditions) and I’ll try and dig up some resources!

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re forgetting that Americans have been brainwashed to think that large tracts of unproductive land with zero biological diversity is a flex. And no one wants to be seen as some poor with bugs in their yard.

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          large tracts of unproductive land with zero biological diversity is a flex.

          You’re right. It was absolutely a flex hundreds of years ago, for places like freaking Versailles. And we’re all living like little kings out here, complete with turning a blind eye to disastrous effect.

          Meanwhile my Chinese neighbors are hard at work cultivating every last scrap of land they own. It’s kind of amazing.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I see the top one and think 2 things:

      a) That looks like a lot of maintenance

      And

      b) They conveniently left out spiders, all those other bugs will attract a shit ton of spiders and I hate spiders. I like ladybugs, dragonflies, butterflies and such, but not so much that I’m willing to deal with spiders and wasps.

      If someone has a way to solve both those problems I’m all for it lmao

    • JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      My landlord exactly. Dude hires people to spray the yard every year because God forbid ants try to approach the building. I’ve tried convincing him not to but he wasn’t having it. I talked to my neighbor and it turns out the guy used to edge the lawn with scissors. Luckily my neighbor is way more agreeable and we’re redoing his lawn more in line with the picture

      • L3mmyW1nks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        A toxic moat around the house might be a better option than sterilizing all life in the garden. Also cool to look at if you color it green and install some lighting

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s a craze for plastic grass in the UK.

      It looks awful and you won’t even get flies, let alone anything useful. Getting dog shit out of them is a nightmare as well.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some people just want to see the world burn (or don’t know better ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean… I agree with all of you…but I hate bugs…unless they are sea bugs those I eat.

  • kd45@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yeah this is not really selling it because most people have a negative amount of interest in more bugs

    • krewllobster@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Until people stop and realize that the birds and the bees includes bugs. It’s not like we can tell them where to be, but we sure as shit need them to exist.

    • MintyAnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There is something so desolate when you live somewhere that native bees and butterflies are rare in. You start to realize it’s due to the lack of nature, forests. The pesticides you and your neighbors dump on your lawn. The lack of any native plants

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Got a couple of acres of swamp down here. Friend of mine won’t visit because of the mosquitoes. Makes sense, right? Swamp = mosquitos.

    But there are hardly any! Might get buzzed twice at sundown, that’s it, far worse at my home. Also, unlike everywhere else in the South, there are zero fire ants. Literally not a single ant to be found.

    All because I have a robust ecosystem out there. The tiny “ground attack” spiders, whatever they’re called, are legion. You won’t see one unless you look for 'em, or shine a flashlight across the ground at night. 100s of thousands per acre, maybe a million+.

    I got banana spiders with fat webs for traps, dragonflies and hummingbirds for helicopters and jets. Tiny lizards prowl everywhere. Tiny fish in the “ponds” eat any larva or eggs that get in there, sometimes surface bugs.

    All that scales up to snakes (oddly rare), small mammals, raptors, you get the idea.

    tl;dr: Healthy system = hellish Deathworld for insects.

    One other note: I’ve cleared about 1,200sq./ft. at the main camp site. Just that tiny bit of clearing is noticeably hotter than 60’-80’ down the trail. Haven’t taken thermometer readings, but you can feel an easy 5°F drop. Amazing that such a small spot becomes a heat island. Now look at the top and bottom pics. Does the bottom pic look hot to you? Does the top pic evoke feelings of coolness? Yeah. Imagine what our cities, roads and fields are doing to the overall environment.

    • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t have a swamp, but I have a wooded yard and can attest to most of what you said. However, in addition to the plethora of bug species and legion of spiders, I also have a shitload of mosquitos.

        • Squirrel@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          That would be difficult to do. There are far more spiders in my yard than I’ve seen elsewhere. It blew me away when I moved here.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, just keep adding spiders. Eventually they either eat everything or you become Spiders Georg and both seem like a win.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not in the same climate as you, but we stopped cutting our grass all the time. We mow about 3-4 times a year. It’s really more of a “harvest” than mowing at this point.

      While the neighbors may not appreciate the shaggy meadow we cultivated, we now have lightning bugs at dusk in the summertime. The neighboring houses? Practically none. I can only imagine what will happen when we start replacing this stuff with local plants.

  • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t see mosquitoes, ticks, chiggers, ants (ants especially on the vines on the house) spiders, roaches, centipedes, or a dozen other specialized bugs that eat your vegetable garden.

    My yard looks like a mix of 1 and 2, but there’s a lot of negatives to your daily life with any of the 3 options and this biased graphic clearly wants you to pick 1 or at least 2 over 3.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    I can tell you from experience that if you neglect your garden for about 15 years, it does not look like that top one at all.

  • shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Who cares about (most) bugs, the first one just straight up looks the best

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think the second one looks the best. When I move I plan to get rid of most of the manicured lawn but I still think a bit of it is nice to have