Florida is on the verge of passing one of the nation’s most restrictive bans on minors’ use of social media after the state Senate passed a bill Thursday that would keep children under the age of 16 off popular platforms regardless of parental approval.

The measure now goes back to the state House, where the speaker has made the issue his top priority during the legislative session that ends March 8. Still, critics have pointed to similar efforts in other states that have been blocked by courts.

The bill targets any social media site that tracks user activity, allows children to upload material and interact with others, and uses addictive features designed to cause excessive or compulsive use. Supporters point to rising suicide rates among children, cyberbullying and predators using social media to prey on kids.

  • Nate Cox@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I fundamentally agree that this would best be served by parents enforcing limits.

    However, my experience is that this kind of parenting is much much harder than people seem to understand.

    If you’re one of a small number of parents who choose to limit social media, in a sea of parents who don’t limit at all, your children end up socially excluded. They get made fun of and ostracized from the rest of the kids. Your parenting decision makes their daily life much, much harder than it should be.

    In practice, it means that as a parent there is no winning option. Or even really acceptable option.

    For maybe the first time in my life, I feel myself siding with the government restrictions option.