Leaked emails show organizers of the prestigious Hugo Awards vetted writers’ work and comments with regard to China, where last year’s awards were held.

Organizers of the Hugo Awards, one of the most prominent literary awards in science fiction, excluded multiple authors from shortlists last year over concerns their work or public comments could be offensive to China, leaked emails show.

Questions had been raised as to why writers including Neil Gaiman, R.F. Kuang, Xiran Jay Zhao and Paul Weimer had been deemed ineligible as finalists despite earning enough votes according to information published last month by awards organizers. Emails released this week revealed that they were concerned about how some authors might be perceived in China, where the Hugo Awards were held last year for the first time.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The Hugos have always been a clusterfuck. Explaining all the nuance is beyond a single comment (I can’t even find a good writeup) but it boils down to the voting committee largely being opt/buy-in. If you buy a membership to the World Science Fiction Society, you get to vote on where WorldCon will be held which means you are voting on where The Hugos will be held. You ALSO get to vote in the Hugos themselves

      Yes, that sounds really shitty but it is also why the Hugos are a lot more prestigious than a Goodreads award. People need to give enough of a shit which, historically, has resulted in more people who actually have read multiple entrants.

      Of course, a couple years back we had the “sad puppies” incident where a bunch of racist incels basically voted as a bloc to shut down people of color and non CISHET male voices.

      And… a lot of signs point toward “China” having gamed the system again. Whether that is a focused effort by the CCP or just passionate Chinese SFF fans is up for debate*.

      As for excluding authors? I very much assume that is just a function of operating in China. The CCP cracking down on the event would not end well for anyone involved.

      Personally? I think this is yet another indication that the Hugos, like most “old guard” SFF, can fuck off. It was just a few years back that George R R Martin rambled and talked about the good old days while butchering every single “ethnic” name on the ballot. I think the issue of “who gets to vote” is still a major issue but I also think there is absolutely zero reason that an event about celebrating forward thinking should restrict itself to an in-person gala. That shit should be going above and beyond vtubers and focusing on new voices who might have a day job because being “a full time author” is increasingly impossible for any newbies.

      *: Because China actually has a ridiculously strong SFF community. In large part because there are authors who are very much pushing the boundaries of what they can and can’t say to actually tell interesting and thought provoking stories in the way SFF has always been able to.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Indeed. Quite decent.

          See, Chinese fandom is relatively isolated from western fandom. And the convention committee didn’t realize that there was this thing called the WSFS Constitution which set out rules for stuff they had to do. I gather they didn’t even realize they were responsible for organizing the nomination and voting process for the Hugo awards, commissioning the award design, and organizing an awards ceremony, until about 12 months before the convention (which is short notice for two rounds of voting. commissioning a competition between artists to design the Hugo award base for that year, and so on). So everything ran months too late, and they had to delay the convention, and most of the students who’d pitched in to buy those bids could no longer attend because of bad timing, and worse … they began picking up an international buzz, which in turn drew the attention of the local Communist Party, in the middle of the authoritarian clamp-down that’s been intensifying for the past couple of years. (Remember, it takes a decade to organize a successful worldcon from initial team-building to running the event. And who imagined our existing world of 2023 back in 2013?)

          The organizers appear to have panicked.

          • Optional@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 months ago

            lolyikes

            The fallout from Chengdu has probably sunk several other future worldcon bids—and it’s not as if there are a lot of teams competing for the privilege of working themselves to death: Glasgow and Seattle (2024 and 2025) both won their bidding by default because they had experienced, existing worldcon teams and nobody else could be bothered turning up. So the Ugandan worldcon bid has collapsed (and good riddance, many fans would vote NO WORLDCON in preference to a worldcon in a nation that recently passed a law making homosexuality a capital offense). The Saudi Arabian bid also withered on the vine, but took longer to finally die. They shifted their venue to Cairo in a desperate attempt to overcome Prince Bone-saw’s negative PR optics, but it hit the buffers when the Egyptian authorities refused to give them the necessary permits. Then there’s the Tel Aviv bid. Tel Aviv fans are lovely people, but I can’t see an Israeli worldcon being possible in the foreseeable future (too many genocide cooties right now). Don’t ask about Kiev (before February 2022 they were considering bidding for the Eurocon). And in the USA, the prognosis for successful Texas and Florida worldcon bids are poor (book banning does not go down well with SF fans).

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Weird that the Hugos wouldn’t have excluded John Ringo and crew for being literal fascists, unless they open their slackened jaws for… Not even criticizing China? Depicting mecha Wu Zetian?

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          ringo and the sad puppies were only “acknowledged” because of the mass backlash. Otherwise, it was business as usual.

          That is why I think the issue is less the works and more the venue. Because having a racist piece of shit present is one thing. People get mad. They move on because they need the blurb to get another printing from their publisher. But if the CCP gets angry? People start disappearing faster than Jack Ma.

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I did not know any of that. I always just figured Hugo award books would at least be good, and that was about as far as my thinking went.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, they almost always are. You just have to understand that, much like with the Oscars (?), it is the SFF (mostly SFF writers) community voting on themselves. And, memes aside, good movies usually win at the Oscars. Sure they favor period pieces and character studies but those are generally well acted and directed. They may just not be “entertaining” to the masses.

          That said, ever since Martin decided he should talk about how great a bunch of transphobes and racists were while butchering the names of up and coming authors because he couldn’t be bothered to read a pronunciation guide, a lot of great authors have started doing their own “awards” blog posts. Which are always nice.

          • harry_balzac@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            This is probably the most helpful comment for me. I enjoy reading scifi and I’ve often used the Hugos as a barometer. Not anymore. Time to start checking blogs of good authors

            Any recommendations?

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      9 months ago

      The worst thing is that the organization censored things that even the CCP doesn’t - several of the excluded books are freely sold in China. Self-censorship is a hell of a drug.

    • randon31415@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same way Jeremy Corbyn became leader of the labor party: Only those with paid memberships can vote on stuff (e.g. where the awards will be presented in the future). China paid for enough new memberships to flood the vote with people that voted to hold it in China.

      • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Weird comparison. I don’t think the least Tory-lite leader of the Labour Party in the last 30 years was voted in as a Chinese conspiracy, as you are implying.

        • randon31415@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          No, China didn’t have anything to do with Corbyn. Just, right before he took control of the party, the party leaders tried to vote him out. There are over 10 million labor voters, but at the time there were only 100,000 paid labor memberships, who were responsible for voting in the party leader. Corbyn got 50,000 (out of the 10 million) new paying members on the rolls and went over night from being on the edge of being expelled to becoming the party leader.

          Same thing happened here: a very large group (all scifi readers) assuming that paying members would have ideals proportional to the larger group - but that smaller group can be manipulated through a large influx of single issue voters.

          • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Firstly, I’m not really sure where you are getting your figures. There were 200,000 paid members under the previous leader and it went up to 600,000 just before he was elected.

            Secondly, it seems like you’re attributing this sharp increase to a third party nefarious action. I would assume that it were simply a larger portion of those 10m voters deciding to register membership in order to vote in a leader more in tune with their party values.

            I take the point that a small group only needing paid membership to vote is open to manipulation. However, I don’t really see a comparison between these two events.

            • randon31415@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I misremembered the number of members - looks like it went up much more drastically than I recalled. And I never said that either were “nefarious actions”, just that a huge influx of new voters with different opinions can alter outcomes.

      • GhostFence@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh man, how long before China has enough global power to censor what we watch in American cinema/TV? Or are we already at that point??? 😱

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          We kind of are? Although, it is mostly at the same level the US has been. Mainstream movies aren’t going to have things that will anger significant markets. Similarly, a decent number of the long living live service games have “china” versions that do stuff like get rid of skeletons and so forth.

          It is obviously speculation, but a LOT of what went wrong with Rise of Skywalker has strong hints of being about the Chinese market.

          • Even the people who hated TLJ with every fiber of their being kind of noticed that Rose Tico almost completely disappeared. And… part of that is speculated to be because Kelly Marie Tran was getting a lot of traction due to the constant bigotry and hatred thrown at her for being asian in a “white” franchise. Except… she is ethnically Vietnamese.
          • The force ghosts don’t have their blue tint which is speculated to be about making it less obvious they are spirits/ghosts
          • TLJ literally ended with “Our elders fucked up and the world is possibly a worse place than it was before The War. But now we are rallying behind a former slave, a scoundrel, and some homeless chick all while force powers are being spread among the proletariat”. ROS IMMEDIATELY retconned all that to “The slave is a goober who belongs with his own people and that homeless chick has a direct connection to the ruling class. Also, the real heroes are our ancestors”.

          Which… again, kind of mirrors how the US and its holy concepts are treated. Take a look at mainstream action movies from basically the 70s to the 10s. The enemy might be a rogue general or CIA operative but you’ll have a heroic US soldier/marine around to counter that out and show that the vast majority of the military are good people (and we still see the impact of that with people trying to reconcile the US military waiting to see how Jan 6 would shake out…). Same with how Democracy is good and amazing and only ever fails because of outright fraud rather than gerrymandering and stupidity/bigotry.

          Just… the main difference is that you can still watch a movie about a squad of US Marines raping and murdering their way through a warzone in the US. Whereas that gets outright banned in China and can lead to a visit to the reeducation camps if the creator lives in China.

          • GhostFence@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not entirely clear on where you’re drawing the line here but American cinema has a rich history of promoting mistrust in the U.S. Government. Eagle Eye, Three Days of the Condor, All the President’s Men, Dr. Strangelove, and the Watchmen, all were mainstream movies produced in that 70s to 10s time period. Some or all of those depict institutionalized corruption on a level you’d probably not ever see coming from China.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago
              • Three Days of the Condor: Rogue CIA op “exposed” by a loyal CIA agent
              • All the President’s Men: About the law and the good parts of the government uniting to stop a criminal president
              • Dr Strangelove: Rogue general with the POTUS et al trying to prevent world war 3
              • The Watchmen: You mean Alan Moore’s wank rag? I don’t think anything about that story is coherent enough to really over-analyze. But the HBO sequel series very much focused on the idea of The Good Cops/Supes
              • Eagle Eye: Did ANYONE watch this? So I’ll talk about Enemy of the State instead since that is an awesome movie. And it very much is about a rogue senator (?) and the NSA overreaching and is stopped by the good government agents and Big Willy Style

              I don’t think it is even a conscious effort most of the time. But it very much pervades US media. And a lot of it even boils down to the actual military propaganda like NCIS or Bradley Cooper’s The A-Team. It is the idea that we are Americans and we are exceptional and we truly value individualism and everyone should praise the NCOs who are going to fight the good fight and make sure they never do anything bad no matter what the evil officers tell them… so make sure to shoot that kid your Sergeant is telling you to because that fucker totally has it coming.

              Mostly I am just trying to point out that we are already adjusting “global” media to placate major demogrpahics. The main difference, like I said, being that pissing off the US Government means republicans won’t watch your movie. Pissing off the CCP means you need to be careful any time you are flying in the Eastern hemisphere.

              • GhostFence@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Three Days of the Condor: Rogue CIA op “exposed” by a loyal CIA agent

                The crucial point is CIA op. The CIA had an oilfield contingency plan. That’s the organization, not just one corrupt individual. Definitely borders on institutional.

                All the President’s Men: About the law and the good parts of the government uniting to stop a criminal president

                “He also states the cover-up was not only intended to camouflage the CREEP involvement, but also to hide “covert operations” involving “the entire U.S. intelligence community”, including the CIA and FBI.”

                Sounds pretty institutional to me when two whole organizations are involved in corruption.

                Dr Strangelove: Rogue general with the POTUS et al trying to prevent world war 3

                Okay, then institutionalized stupidity.

                The Watchmen: You mean Alan Moore’s wank rag? I don’t think anything about that story is coherent enough to really over-analyze. But the HBO sequel series very much focused on the idea of The Good Cops/Supes

                Oh come on, the Government had collateral damage galore in Vietnam. And the killing of war protesters. All institutionally orchestrated.

                Eagle Eye: Did ANYONE watch this? So I’ll talk about Enemy of the State instead since that is an awesome movie. And it very much is about a rogue senator (?) and the NSA overreaching and is stopped by the good government agents and Big Willy Style

                The NSA is an institution and they blew up those civilian targets. Nobody stopped that. That’s what triggered everything else.

                But this is my main point here:

                Mostly I am just trying to point out that we are already adjusting “global” media to placate major demogrpahics. The main difference, like I said, being that pissing off the US Government means republicans won’t watch your movie. Pissing off the CCP means you need to be careful any time you are flying in the Eastern hemisphere.

                Yes, China is creating censorship of the worst form imaginable. And it is affecting what we Americans are able to see on cinema. All the downvoters on here see nothing wrong with this picture?

                • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Oh come on, the Government had collateral damage galore in Vietnam. And the killing of war protesters. All institutionally orchestrated.

                  And “Vietnam was bad” is a fight the US had long since lost. It is very acceptable to say “things were bad” then and it has increasingly become one of those “See, we don’t fall for propaganda. Look how much we learned from the last time we entered a conflict we didn’t understand with goals that weren’t well articulated and rules of engagement that were the worst of all worlds”. And if it isn’t obvious: am I talking about Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Iraq, Afghanistan, or (Erastil protect us) Israel?

                  But the institution is bad

                  Yeah.

                  It is the idea that we are Americans and we are exceptional and we truly value individualism and everyone should praise the NCOs who are going to fight the good fight and make sure they never do anything bad no matter what the evil officers tell them… so make sure to shoot that kid your Sergeant is telling you to because that fucker totally has it coming.

                  Again, this IS how the US does propaganda. We like to pretend we are all unique individuals with maximum agency because FREEDOM. And that is how we somehow decided that “a few bad apples” doesn’t ruin the bunch. And pretty much the basis for all the actual direct funded propaganda. Parts of the institutions are bad but the boots on the ground are heroes so you better fucking thank Chet Hanks for his service if you want some salmon.

                  And… again, you are kind of falling for it hook line and sinker. Don’t worry, I also didn’t realize how pervasive this was and even pointed out that stuff like the Call of Duty games were “shockingly not ‘rah rah america’ because the bad guys are US generals”. It really was the Bradley Cooper A-Team (which… I actually really liked) that made it obvious that… that is the point. The generals might make you do horrible stuff so you shouldn’t feel bad if you rape and murder a family because you can’t tell the difference between one set of brown people and another. But the men in the foxhole next to you and the NCOs who relay those orders are all good and heroic people who are just doing their best".

                  And once you realize that is the formula? It becomes REALLY obvious how much media is “propaganda” whether it is directly funded by the US military or just people emulating the folk tales they grew up on.

                  And it is VERY important to understand that. In the same way it is important to understand that not all pro-China spin is “And we only avoided war because general sexy china guy believed Amy Adams and chose to not escalate” or “China was kind enough to give a rocket to Childish Gambino and Boromir because they truly believe in science and humanity” and a lot of it really is the kind of stuff we saw in Rise of Skywalker.

                  Because, yes, I am sure at least a few of those stories are outright thought crimes as far as the CCP is concerned. But a lot of it is going to just be a case of, to use an American term, someone not thanking the troops before a set or being overly critical of the brave men and women of the mujaheddin. It won’t get someone outright banned, but it does lead to the discourse of “Well, they just get too political” which hurts the bottom line in other ways. It is just… because the CCP, “hurts the bottom line” really means “gets your whole event investigated by the CCP”.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I don’t even know where to start with this it’s so nonsensical. Sure there are rights in China but to compare it favourably to the US smells so bad I find it hard to believe anyone could genuinely believe it.

        I’ve spent about 6 months in both countries over the course of my life (I’m old) and China is far, far more oppressed than the US. The population there are entirely cowed, can’t express themselves freely on social media, until recently couldn’t even decide the number of children they could have, can’t protest in numbers, can’t send end to end encrypted messages, can’t access the full internet, can’t use a VPN without risk of being prosecuted and on and on and on.

        Sure the US has it’s flaws but trying to say China is doing better from a rights perspective is just bananas.

      • mellowheat@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        1. Freedom of Speech and Expression

        2. Freedom of Press

        3. Freedom of Religion

        4. Right to Peaceful Assembly

        5. Right to Fair Trial

        Aren’t all of these rights quite a lot weaker in China? None of this is a problem of course if you keep your head down or be a bootlicker, but not having to lick boots is pretty much the motivation for human rights.

      • baseless_discourse@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        You can say “death” on youtube videos in the U.S. … Please find a popular bilibili video uses 死 (actual character for “death”) in the subtitle, instead of 亖 (pronouned the same, but means “four”).

        U.S. definitely is not a country that respects basic human rights, but at least they don’t need repos like these to speak on the internet: https://github.com/houbb/sensitive-word/ . You can find the sensitive words here: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/houbb/sensitive-word/master/src/main/resources/dict.txt

        Most of these are sexual words, but it is not hard to see that basically everything related to politics is a sensitive word, including names of politicians, current or past; political organization, position no matter they are pro or anti CCP; and political events, anywhere from massacre, protest, to just congressional meetings.

        Many other words related to human right and economics. For example, words like 中国孤儿院 (chinese orphanage), 中国民主 (Chinese democracy), 中国特色 (Chinese specialty), 中国石油腰斩 (Chinese oil stock lowered 50%), 你乃人民 (you are the people) and many many more.

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Did you forget about tiananmen square? Hong Kong protests? I think you did. Or you’re a boot licker.