Since Elon Musk became Twitter’s CEO, he’s been pushing through a lot of changes to the social network. But perhaps…

  • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did you conveniently leave off the rest of my sentence there?

    Also come on…talking about how many birds might have died from the rockets explosion way up in the sky, when the likely answer is zero? Really?

    • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why did you cherry pick the one thing you can dismiss and ignore that they’ve been causing actual environmental damage?

      • TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They did the same thing in my comment thread. Ignored my source, cherry-picked a single argument they had a rebuttal for, and dismissed any culpability SpaceX could have had.

      • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        When that’s one of the first and main points brought up in the article and it’s so stupid it basically screams “this article is garbage”.

        You’re talking about environmental damage limited to some tiny little area around the launch site. If that’s the best you’ve got, give up.

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some people are definitely worth talking to and discussing opposing viewpoints.

          You do not seem to be one of those people. Have a lovely day.