• doylio@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    It does NOT fucking matter if it’s “”“”““waste””“”“” energy

    Sounds like you don’t actually care about the energy use, you just hate this for moral reasons. Using excess energy has zero externalities

    • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, its not like we could store that energy in say a battery and then use it another time when demand is higher for actually useful things instead of jerking off techbros/cryptobros.

      • doylio@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I would love if this were an option, but it’s not. The current battery technologies don’t have the scale for grid level storage capacity. The only grid scale storage solution that is really being done is to build very expensive infrastructure that moves water between two dams of different heights, and building more of those doesn’t seem politically likely at the moment

        The reality is that there is much a whole bunch of excess energy supply that is produced because power plants can’t cycle up and down with demand. So they have to keep producing at peak demand 24/7 (there is some nuances based on the type of power plant, NatGas is faster to turn on/off, but this is broadly true)

        I have my qualms with Bitcoin. As a currency it has significant transaction speed problems, and potential security ones after a couple more halvenings. But I don’t see a problem if Bitcoin miners want to pay energy producers to use energy that would be produced anyway and earn the producers nothing.