• saintshenanigans@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s not even about money anymore.

    I’m not positive that the world is going to be a comfortable place to live in at all in the next 40-80 years. I can’t be sure it’s morally acceptable to bring a new life into the world just to struggle until death. I know if I were given the choice I would have rather just not have been, it’s not worth struggling forever just to barely get by until the game changes yet again and you get knocked back down to the peg you started on.

    • Icaria@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I can’t be sure it’s morally acceptable to bring a new life into the world just to struggle until death.

      That has been true for just about everyone throughout history.

      the game changes yet again and you get knocked back down to the peg you started on.

      People in the developed world not having kids is part of how they ‘win’ the game.

      The reason boomers were able to demand so much is because, as the name implies, they’re a big fucking cohort. They were politically influential from the time they could vote. Keeping birthrates depressed and shipping in cheap foreign labour is how those with power keep everyone else powerless.

      It’s a weird situation, but the way to improve living standards for future generations is to… have future generations. Even if you don’t feel like you can entirely support them now.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’ll bring the “Population Bomb” doomers out, proving failed predictions never have consequences for the predictors since they can always say it will happen next year- since 1798