sag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 months agoBiggest Betrayallemm.eeimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1780arrow-down18cross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1772arrow-down1imageBiggest Betrayallemm.eesag@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 9 months agomessage-square29fedilinkcross-posted to: nonpolitical_memes@lemmy.ml
minus-squareyeehaw@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up79arrow-down2·edit-29 months agoTo use “u”, “ur”, and “your” in the same sentence is mind-blowing.
minus-squarenightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up34·9 months agoAt least they r each used correctly.
minus-squareexplodicle@local106.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·9 months agoDid Zoomers just solve a huge problem that’s plagued the English-speaking world for generations?
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·9 months agoI think text speak is a bit older than the zoomers. But in any case, I propose u’re for the sake of grammatical correctness.
minus-squarejaybone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoOk professor. Now fix their, there and they’re.
minus-squareBlackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·9 months agoThei’re. Just merge them. Simple.
minus-squareNoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 months agoNo it’s an extra kink in the maze of English, double possessive forms.
To use “u”, “ur”, and “your” in the same sentence is mind-blowing.
At least they r each used correctly.
Did Zoomers just solve a huge problem that’s plagued the English-speaking world for generations?
I think text speak is a bit older than the zoomers.
But in any case, I propose u’re for the sake of grammatical correctness.
Ok professor. Now fix their, there and they’re.
Thei’re. Just merge them. Simple.
No it’s an extra kink in the maze of English, double possessive forms.
And yet here you are