Is Musk competing with Zuck for the worst branding ever?

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Meta’s rebranding at least makes sense. The company has been more than Facebook for a long time, so collecting everything under a different umbrella isn’t too far fetched. Facebook still exists as a product, so they haven’t thrown away all the brand value. Google did kind of the same with Alphabet.

    Rebranding Twitter to X doesn’t make sense at all.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they’re not just re-branding. Twitter is now under some kind of corporate shell company. I haven’t seen much coverage of that, but my suspicion is that it’s intended to act as some kind of insulator to contain Twitter’s debts.

      Like when they break a company into pieces and put everyone’s debts and no assets into a single part and then that part declares bankruptcy and all the debt magically goes away, leaving everything else with lots of assets and no debts and a future that looks really rosy. I can’t help but think that this is something similar to that.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow, I wish I could split myself up into separate entities to bankrupt part of so that I can get away Scott free. But alas, I’m a real person, not a company with “personhood.”

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially because they bought a bunch of companies that weren’t Facebook. Another example is Google rebranding as Alphabet. Those make complete sense.

  • NoisyOne57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Musk previously owned an online banking site known as x.com, which would later merge with PayPal, another service founded by Musk, which then became a separate entity with Musk no longer being involved it.

    And when Musk was forced to complete the purchase of Twitter, he announced plans to make Twitter into a “Super app” like China’s WeChat application, which can be used for payments.

    Musk’s hyperfocus on X might also be because when he was in his twenties, everything “cool” was having an X in it, like XForce and stuff like that.

    He also wanted to create his X Corp company to have a single X as its name, but he couldn’t do that because there was an Alphabet company already using that name.

  • Vaggumon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The simple answer: Elon Musk is a whole lot stupider then he was given credit for.

  • palebluethought@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can we also talk about how absurd that picture at the bottom of the login page is? It looks like something a warez site would have as its landing page in like 2003. Made by some guy named xXx_l33tz3r0_xXx

    • Schaedelbach@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Haha, this makes me actually nostalgic thinking about some of the warez sites I frequented back in 2002/2003! Scanning for “pubs” with scetchy software was what I considered a good time back then.

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude I thought the same. Thought it was some stock photo of “hacker”. and absolutel looks like warez from the 90s.

  • Maharashtra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just Elon Eloning his Elonism to Eloning levels.

    More seriously: Elon decided it’s a good move to rebrand his new toy. Nobody knows for sure what’s going through his head. It’s probably some sort of OCD, or something…

  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    With Facebook Threads being the new kid on the block and after all the bad publicity, rebranding Twitter was probably seen as a good PR move.

  • ButtholeAnnihilator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon can never let perceived slights go, like the Thai cave rescuer thing. He wanted PayPal to be called X and lost, now he’s rebuilding it 20 years later.

    • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the most recognizeable brands from the past 20 years is suddenly changing it’s branding and throwing all that recognition into the trash. I don’t know why people keep acting like this isn’t worth talking about. I don’t give two shits about musk or Twitter and don’t even have Twitter accounts or whatever, but even I recognize this is a noteworthy change (and his reasons for doing it) for the world.

  • Slashzero@hakbox.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I bet they will move all the space-X live streams off of YouTube and onto Twitter X and require a paid subscription.

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Part of me wonders if it’s an attempt to tank the SEO, so people can’t search for or news or easily talk about the site anymore - because it’s been nothing but bad.