• SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let’s fucking go, it’s about time they got all the benefits of statehood while being beholden to the rules.

    I’ll miss a couple of friends I had in Texas, but I warned them ages ago, so it’s on them.

    • stevehobbes@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      They may not like the taxes as much though - there’s a ton of industry and some finance there that might just leave.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        They don’t have to be a state but imagine how rich it would be if we invested ad much money as we currently give Texas

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 months ago

    And if any other states leave with Texas - Guam, American Samoa, US Virgin Islands and DC will immediately be expedited in their statehood confirmations. It’s a win win all round.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      Guam pretty specifically will not, since they have laws saying that only people who are 50% Guam-native or more are allowed to buy land there. That’s very much illegal by US law and is a hard blocker to their statehood.

      I get why they have that law, but it puts them in a weird position of permanently US-adjacent without ever becoming a full state.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      California receives more per person according to that data, and California would have the 8th highest GDP in the world if it were a country. This isn’t the best metric.

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Texas would have to issue its own money, and getting enough money wouldn’t be the issue; they could just print it. It will be all the things that come with establishing new money.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Per your link, Texas is pretty low on the list of federal funds as a percentage of the budget. Much less so than many northern states.

      Just looking at the amount of money received is a poor metric.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        To me that implies TX will have a 20% gap to fill, and I am not sure that 20% counts as “pretty low”. What do you mean? FWIW, I didn’t downvote you.

        • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Oh that’s easy, they’ll just make that the new sales tax! Take I from the poor with more regressive taxes.

  • Political Incorruption@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    My dark side came out when these clowns started up again. Let’s give the Republican Party just the tip of Texas, ship all willing, then immediately declare war on Trumpistan.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    An interesting fact about the US Navy is that all of its battleships have been named after states - except for one which was named Kearsarge (after a ship which during the Civil War hunted down and sank the Confederate raider Alabama). This is why I support allowing Puerto Rico in as a state so long as they change their name to Kearsarge.