Mozilla is unhappy because the use of browser engines other than WebKit will be restricted to the EU, forcing them to develop two different apps.

For an independent browser like Firefox, managing two browsers is not easy, so it can be forgiven that this could be seen as almost harassment.

Also, the fact that the use of browser engines other than WebKit is limited to iOS means that the use of WebKit is still forced on iPadOS, which also increases the effort for Mozilla.

Source: https://iphonewired.com/news/746093/

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      124
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s not a solution. It’s a way for you to avoid the problem. It does nothing to help the millions of people who are already deeply invested in the Apple ecosystem.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          Not sure if it’s a fallacy if it’s about addressing people who have spent a ton on an ecosystem and can’t just devote more money to buy the alternative and time to figure out the parts that aren’t compatible

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            What parts aren’t compatible? And you can load Linux and Windows on all Mac’s. You can also sell your iPhone and buy an android phone with money left over… getting out of the apple closed ecosystem is cheaper than sticking with it.

            • NateNate60@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              For most people, time is not regarded to be free (i.e. not a cost). As a devoted Linux user, the adage that “Linux is only free if you don’t value your time” is absolutely true.

                • NateNate60@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Learning Windows is still a time cost. You’re also losing your library of Mac software and quite a few interoperability features between your other Apple products.

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    ??? So you’re plan is to just say fuck it, and continue to be fucked over by apple? The fuck logic is that? Almost all software has a replacement in windows/Linux. I work in all 3 ecosystems, there is very little that lacks an alternative in each os. Sticking to osx/iOS is just a cop out.

            • LWD@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You can’t refund anything that’s not physical, for one…

                • LWD@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You asked what parts aren’t compatible, and one answer is everything bought for Apple computers, iPhones, iPads, etc. Apps, media, anything that isn’t subscription based.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, it’s not a sunk-cost fallacy.

          If you already have a bunch of Apple stuff, it makes more sense to continue using Apple stuff, because switching would cost money and effort. You’d also lose access to the software library that you paid for.

          Having a bunch of Apple stuff also makes buying more Apple stuff in the future a better value proposition because you gain access to features that you wouldn’t otherwise have. Platform lock-in is not a sunk-cost fallacy. You’re just uninformed and being smug about it.

          The sunk cost fallacy only applies when stopping is free or the cost is low enough (in money or effort) that it makes more sense to quit than continue.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        That is the solution though, always has been. Vote with your wallet.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, let’s ignore the entire history of labor, environmental, safety, and product regulations, and believe everything is the way it is because of our dogmatic free market feefees.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Lol for a moment there I thought I was going off the rails with my puffa jacket rant above, but your segway into “free market feefees” is far more unhinged.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Lol that’s basically the Brave attitude, drown out the controversy with a marketing campaign and pull in more new unsuspecting users than the ones you lose.

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You cannot root out the evil from within such massive companies. Nvidia still has a stranglehold on the market with CUDA. Literally the only thing one can do is to employ their wallet towards more fruitful endeavours, like donating and purchasing Android in this case. People who are invested into Apple are going to have to face that they made a choice moving away from freedom, even though I understand that staying the odd one out socially isn’t a lot of fun. There’s nothing to be done here unless someone with a lot of money and lawyers sues Apple. Know anyone willing to do that?

      • takeda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Then deinvest?

        What a fucking argument. “Yes, it is a problem, but it is too hard for me to do anything about it, someone else should fix it”

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      People should fully own the computers they buy, regardless of which company they buy from.

      This means root access and a replacable primary bootloader, let alone just being able to install apps not on a curated market (what Apple calls sideloading). macOS and Windows both manage to allow root access, and so do certain Android devices (and obviously other OSs as well). Replacable primary bootloaders are more rare, though, especially in ARM devices due to efuse-based secure boot in the CPU that is impossible to turn off. There’s only one phone I can think of that allows for replacing the primary bootloader (Shift 6mq).

      We shouldn’t allow for artificial restrictions placed by corporations on devices they sell, because as we have seen time and time again, companies copy each others’ restrictions, especially Apple. Same goes with game consoles, IoT devices, Smart TVs, etc. And before you mention the potential for piracy, DRM is an artificial restriction placed by corporations, and should also be removed from devices.

      Anything less means that you don’t own the device that you paid for.

      Apple is clearly attempting to comply with the EU DMA in bad faith so that they can maintain as much control over their users and app developers as possible.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      boycotts barely work, and doubly so when the company has a legion of faithful fanbois and its among the biggest corporations on the planet.

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d like to add that even if you sell apple. The only other alternative is android and they have their own set of issues.

      For me, an iPhone that allows sideloading would be a huge step towards perfect.