“People will lose their jobs,” the think tank’s president says about federal workers. “Hopefully their lives are able to flourish in spite of that.”

Since taking over the Heritage Foundation in 2021, Kevin D. Roberts has been making his mark on an institution that came to prominence during the Reagan years and has long been seen as an incubator of conservative policy and thought.

Roberts, who was not well known outside policy circles when he took over, has pushed the think tank away from its hawkish roots by arguing against funding the war in Ukraine, a turnabout that prompted some of Heritage’s policy analysts to leave. Now he’s looking ahead, to the 2024 election and beyond.

Roberts told me that he views Heritage’s role today as “institutionalizing Trumpism.” This includes leading Project 2025, a transition blueprint that outlines a plan to consolidate power in the executive branch, dismantle federal agencies and recruit and vet government employees to free the next Republican president from a system that Roberts views as stacked against conservative power. The lesson of Trump’s first year in office, Roberts told me, is that “the Trump administration, with the best of intentions, simply got a slow start. And Heritage and our allies in Project 2025 believe that must never be repeated.”

Non-paywall link

  • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    10 months ago

    Don’t worry, the Supreme Court would never allow them to do such brazenly unconstitutional - what’s that? The heritage foundation hand picked the conservative majority in the supreme court?

    Oh, nevermind. We’re fucked.

    • pingveno@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      The Federalist Society handpicked the the conservative majority, not the Heritage Foundation.

        • pingveno@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Nah, that’s a bit reductive. There’s internal dissent within the conservative movement. Not everyone’s willing to go full fasc with Trump. A good chunk of the judges that were ruling against him in the 2020 election were Federalist Society members.