While Education and Organizing is building the parts for a new engine the rest of the year.

  • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    Hence educating and organizing the other 364 days of the year.

    • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think a better strategy is to run for office rather than vote. Because voting doesn’t do much if the available candidates are turncoats or shills. It should be educate, organize, and run. Otherwise we get more Scinemas running for raising minimum wage and not at all voting for it when it counts most.

      • harmsy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’d say the people who voted third party are the ones who fucked around in 2016, and ALL of us found out because of it.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Dictatorship it is then. 3rd parties don’t stand a snowballs chance in hell right now.

        Canvassing and outreach happen first, then you can vote for that party. Right now you’re literally handing Republicans the win if you vote 3rd party this election.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Dems deciding to fuck around and find out…

        Yeah! Sending minorities to concentration camps will really show those Dems!

        • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Punch up not down. Democrat leadership decides on policy, Democrat leadership decides on election strategy.

          “I won’t vote for leader that heinous thing x” is a reasonable position to have. “I will vote for leader that doesn’t heinous thing y” is also a reasonable position to have.

          The compromise isn’t to get people to vote for x, it’s for the leader to stop x. Particularly, if the opponent would do x but worse. That only shows, to the Democrat leader, y is a resonable cost for x.

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            “I won’t vote for leader that does heinous long-standing thing that most of the electorate agrees with even though the only other viable candidate wants to pursue an even worse policy on the issue!” is just “I support heinous long-standing thing getting worse!” with extra steps.

            • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Except those that don’t vote to support the thing can’t be said to support the thing at all. “Those that didn’t support the thing are the same as those that wanted it more” is self-serving at best and intellectually dishonest at worst. By the same token I wouldn’t suggest anyone that votes Democrat supports anything the Democrats do because that would also be self serving at best and intellectually dishonest at worst.

              I get you’ve had these arguments before, I’ve certainly read them, and I’m not trying to rehash them.

              The point that I’m tying, and failing I suppose, to make is the frustration/anger is misplaced.