While Education and Organizing is building the parts for a new engine the rest of the year.

  • Hotchip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    Didn’t she win the popular vote?

    This is just shit libs blaming the left instead of taking responsibility for running a shit candidate with so much baggage that she lost while “winning”

    If you want to be mad at anyone, blame the dnc.

    • Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bernie would have whooped trump in 2016. Shame the dnc decided to change the rules the day of to avoid a split ticket or God forbid, supporting the actually viable candidate.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Bernie would have whooped trump in 2016. Shame the dnc decided to change the rules the day of to avoid a split ticket or God forbid, supporting the actually viable candidate.

        DNC/DCCC isn’t exactly in the business of winning elections. If it comes between winning an election and BAU (they’d rather have a republican they can ‘work’ with), they pick BAU. They’ll happily (and have) fund Republicans over Progressives.

      • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        6 months ago

        Sanders, God love him, was not going to be electable. Had they run him, Trump would have picked up the whole of the big fat moderate lump in the middle of the bell curve.

        Exactly like Boris Johnson did when he ran against Jeremy Corbyn. The capitalists simply won’t allow socialists to win in this environment.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sanders, God love him, was not going to be electable. Had they run him, Trump would have picked up the whole of the big fat moderate lump in the middle of the bell curve.

          This is simply false, and the same consistent misunderstanding of real politic that keeps the DNC on the struggle bus.

          • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            By the same logic Trump would not have been considered viable. See how that played out.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Sanders, God love him, was not going to be electable.

          Literally every single poll says otherwise. We’ll never know for certain, but there’s much more evidence to support a Sanders victory than a Sanders loss, and claiming that Trump would have picked up enough moderates to win is baseless speculation.

      • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        6 months ago

        Lol, no.

        Bernie is the Ron Paul of the left; he has a small group of very loud supporters online who by constantly shouting at each other on the internet have convinced themselves that he’s actually some sort of populist god. I mean seriously, he couldn’t even win the popular vote in the Democratic Primary in 2016, losing to Hillery by over three million votes, where were all the extra voters to “whoop” Trump supposed to come from?

          • Sludgehammer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            6 months ago

            “Pro-Trump Russian asset Wikileaks reveals that DNC said mean things about our Lord and Savior Bernie Sanders”

            Seriously, have you actually looked at the Wikileak emails rather than the hype? It’s the weakest shit imaginable.

            • Vailliant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You sound like someone who thinks Russiagate and rachel maddow were legit. WikiLeaks used to be trumpeted by liberals as a bastion of truth untill Assange came out with the corrupt dnc stuff. Which you can still all read, yes they conspired with Hillary. MSNBC and CNN gave her easy questions while grilling Bernie. “Weakest shit indeed”.

              If the establishment doesn’t like the candidate they won’t get airtime. Same shit with Dean Philips and Marianne Williamson. The Biden team places some phone calls and bam your campaign is dead and no airtime/coverage. Are they viable candidates, who knows?

              Should they at least get airtime and be heard in a democratic process?? Yes…

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              The emails were never even denied, and they are damning as hell. That is precisely why the entire response, to this day, has been to ignore what was revealed and go after the people who revealed it. Yes, it was shit people revealing shit about other shit people.

    • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, I will always be mad at the DNC for not running Sanders.

      Doesn’t mean I’m not gonna vote Biden in Nov 2024 though.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        6 months ago

        Then you aren’t mad at the DNC you support their decision to keep the status quo in check

        • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Bruh I participated in the 2020 Nevada caucuses when I lived there, and I stood for Bernie (which he won btw, Biden took second). Idk what else you want me to do when he didn’t make the final cut.

          I will always vote for the Dem in the General, and do my best to make changes in the primary/local elections where I vote Progressive.

          Otherwise, you risk a Republican winning the General, and that will mean FURTHER devastation for American society at a quicker pace.

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Otherwise, you risk a Republican winning the General, and that will mean FURTHER devastation for American society at a quicker pace.

            Make no mistake - that’s what these people want.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 months ago

            Bernie himself is stanning for the Democrats after they screwed him over. He even still refuses to call the genocide in Gaza a genocide. He didn’t even call for a ceasefire for a long time. Many Bernie staffers are very disappointed with him that’s a lot closer than you shaking his hand

            Bernie is not the second coming of jesus. He bent the knee. Just passing motions like a human rights report is the most weak sauce left wing thing America has left.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        So we’re gonna act like winning the popular vote and losing isn’t a problem in and of itself?

        Right?

        Apoligists. Apologists all the way down.

      • Hotchip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Neat. I’m over being chastised while voting for a piece of shit that was “the lesser evil”

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t you see the contradiction in “she won the popular vote” and “she was a shit candidate”?

      It’s kinda like the contradiction that Bernie could win the general election, but 12% of his voters defecting to Trump wasn’t enough to make a difference.

      Leftists are going to be shouting “the DNC is corrupt” on the gallows after Trump wins.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanders–Trump_voters

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        Don’t you see the contradiction in “she won the popular vote” and “she was a shit candidate”?

        No, because the popular vote isn’t how US elections are won. She needed to appeal to the people in the 5 or so states that actually matter and failed to do so.

      • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Don’t you see the contradiction in “she won the popular vote” and “she was a shit candidate”?

        Both of these things can be true. If “did not vote” had been a candidate in 2016, it would have won in a landslide. Just 8 states + DC had enough voters turn out such that any candidate won more votes than there were eligible voters that didn’t bother. As a percentage of eligible voters, Clinton received 28.43% of eligible voters, with Trump trailing at 27.2% of eligible voters. While Trump outperformed Romney (2012) by 2M votes, Clinton underperformed Obama in 2012.

        As a percentage of the entire US population (including those too young or other ineligible to vote) Clinton got votes from 20.30% of the population and Trump got votes from 19.41% of people.

        They both sucked so badly that just over a quarter of eligible voters/less than a fifth of everybody was all it took to elect Trump

        (source https://brilliantmaps.com/did-not-vote/)

        • Hotchip@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          TF do you think our vote was? I can’t vote any harder or some shit.

          The hilarious bit was all the shit libs backing comey during russiagate. It’s literally his fault she lost.

          • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah but in their eyes it couldn’t be anything wrong with her as it was her turn so couldn’t have been his handling of anything

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        “Leftists are going to be shouting “the DNC is corrupt” on the gallows after Trump wins.”

        This is the stupid shit is see all over lemmy that makes me so mad… Yes the DNC SUCKS but guess what? They’re the status quo right now, and the alternative is literally a fucking dictatorship that has vindictive actions as their highest priority.

        There aren’t even dog whistles anymore, he’s using the word dictator… But yeah BomberBiden… Mr.Genocide… I get it… So that means let Trump win? Seriously?

    • DreamerofDays@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Or blame both.

      There’s more than one way to solve most problems, and more than one cause as well. Would a stronger candidate have succeeded? Perhaps. But that was a solution for earlier in the process. A solution for late in the process was voters turning up.

      • Hotchip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        We literally had that candidate and he got fucked over by super deligates or some nonsense.

        I’m sick of being blamed when I voted for someone as vile as hrc. Dems lost the vote, not me.

        Maybe if hrc actually showed up to purple states and appealed to actual voters it would have went differently.

  • young_broccoli@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    106
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    But people did vote for Hillary, IIRC, she won the popular vote by like 3 million votes.

    So it wasnt a lack of voting that gave trump the presidency and repealed abortion rights. It was the mecanisms and institutions that are part of your electoral process and that only seem to exist in order to dilute your democracy (e. voting districts, electoral college) that gave trump the win.

    Perhaps people would be more willing to vote if their voices were actually heard.

      • Hotchip@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Demsocs (really, socdems) still believe in capitalism. They’re not quite Debs levels of socialist.

        • honey_im_meat_grinding@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It’s probably more accurate to state that they believe capitalism and markets to be two separate things, for example a market economy where every business is a multi-stakeholder worker-consumer coop and workers and “consumers” alike can consent to what happens at work, would be at odds with private ownership given that everyone is an owner with decision making power (collective/socialized ownership). This is pretty much what Corbyn and the Labour party a few years back were aiming for - they were going to experiment with cooperatives by having the government encourage and fund them.

      • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        A socialist will never be elected.

        Christ, they’ve been calling every democrat a socialist for 20 years now and it’s chased half of the democrats rightward so far that it’s a problem for a lot of democrats to keep voting for that

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Uhhhh no. He didn’t pull any votes because he wasn’t even on the ticket during the general election and he endorsed Hillary. Also, considering how unpopular Hillary was she should have picked Bernie as her VP. Picking anti union, milked toste Tim Kain was a joke.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If Hilary hadn’t been a pile of shit doing private speaking engagements for billionaires that were so hush hush that they set up massive white noise generating speaker systems, people would have voted for her.

    if Hilary had set a fucking foot in some of the states she lost, people would have voted for her.

    if Hilary didnt make stupid fucking comments, people would have voted for her.

    Maybe if you stopped blaming voters, and blamed the shitty fucking candidates, someone less awful would have run, and won.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Blame the DNC. They’re the one cramming shitty candidates down our throats. If OP is right, and voting for president is just changing the oil, it’s like getting charged $2000 for Dollar General oil.

      Stop blaming voters. Field actual, progressive, leftist candidates. I am fucking sick of voting for right wing, war hawk Democrats to “save democracy.” We aren’t saving anything, just watching stock market addicted octagenarians kill the country slower than the other team.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yup. The DNC is what’s trying to stay in power, which is why Biden and Kamala were forced in, because they obey.

        It’s also why Niki Hailey is being pushed on the news. They want her to win because she’ll also obey.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes, I want octagenarians that kill the country slower than the other team. Why? Because I know the game is rigged against the trust busting hero we actually need… but I’m hoping they’ll drop dead of “Being absurdly old” while we still have a country, so a younger generation can fix it.

        Sorry, but there’s no easy hollywood solution where Sylvester Stallone blows up Capitalism, gets the girl, and throws UBI out of his “Just Married” sports car… Does that metaphor scan? I know that’s not really how movies work anymore… now it’s more like Tom Holland blows up Socialism because it ate a puppy in the third act to remind the audience it’s evil, doesn’t get the girl because getting the girl is “problematic” (which to be fair it kinda is), and then teases yet another god damn crossover event that we know and care nothing about…

        • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There will always be more Josh Hawleys, because the shareholders of the GOP will find them, and get them nominated and then elected to safe seats.

          You can’t wait out the GOP in the hopes that nature will take its course. It will never, ever stop.

          We need an actual trust-busting, corruption-prosecuting bastard who isn’t afraid of keeping friends across the aisle, or preserving relationships with the right law firms or lobbying firms.

          We need someone who will pack the court.

          We need DC and PR to become states.

          We need someone who will cut off federal dollars to parasitic red states for destroying representative democracy.

          We need someone who will discipline people like Joe Manchin when they corruptly protect extractive industry. Turn off as much federal money to West Virginia as you can, and plaster the TV with ads saying “Joe Manchin made this happen.”

          We need someone who isn’t afraid to be LBJ, or TR.

          Basically, when the metaphorical foxes are running the henhouse, you need a bastard fox hunter. Not a slightly-less-increaingly-worse fox.

        • pachrist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There is an easy solution.

          Nearly every other democracy in the world uses it.

          But the RNC and DNC have monopolized our political system and brainwashed the voting base against the real solution: voting for anyone else. Don’t be a coward and keep eating shit. Vote third party.

          I live in a place where my voice and vote have been taken from me by gerrymandering and the electoral college. Millions of Americans live like this. If you want to eat shit and vote Biden to avoid eating more shit with Trump, I absolutely understand. It’s basic math.

          But if you’re a liberal living in rural Tennessee like I am, and your vote is literal trash, I’d encourage every one of those people who’ve had their vote and choice stolen from them, like I have, to vote third party every time.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Do not vote third party, I know it’s tempting to believe in a hero who will swoop in and fix all this, but the last time we elected someone because they were an “Outsider”, we got Trump, and it doesn’t matter, the system is rigged against third parties.

            The Republicans actively encourage Third Parties to be as Left as they can, solely because they know they’re unelectable and will split the vote

            God now I’m remembering Sean Haugh…

            By continously throwing away your vote, you are guranteeing Tenessee stays the way it is

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Actual leftist candidates–or progressive candidates, because those are very much not the same thing–wouldn’t get even 10% of the primary votes, even if the DNC was entirely hands-off. They certainly wouldn’t get the kind of donations that they would need to run a successful national campaign. Genuine leftists simply aren’t popular in the US as a whole, even if Gen Z might trend more strongly towards certain aspects of socialism/communism/anarchism than people of my generation did.

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re changing my premise.

            OP is saying that you should vote for leftists or progressives. I’m saying that they don’t tend to have strong enough support in the American electorate to win primaries. You’re saying that leftist or progressive ideas win elections. That’s not the same thing at all.

            Certain progressive ideas have reached some kind of national consensus, like the idea that minimum wage needs to be a living wage. That’s still not popular in a lot of places, but okay, let’s roll with it. OTOH, major structural criminal justice reform–reduction in police, more addiction treatment programs (that aren’t based in religion), reform-minded prison, etc.—does not have popular support. Republicans are largely law-and-order/crime-and-punishment types, and a significant percentage of Dems are as well. Running on a ‘defund the police’ platform tends to cost people elections, which is why you see Biden increasing funding for cops. It doesn’t matter if data strongly suggests that the approach we’re using doesn’t work, and can’t work; people that see crime as a moral issue can’t accept anything other than punishment.

            If you want to change all of this, you have to start long before elections.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          no, clearly we need to show our disapproval by letting the literal fascists win!

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            This, I keep wondering what the hell the “Anarkiddies” expect, they act like we can just pull up to the CEO of Fascism’s house with a katana and be all “Nothing personnel kid!”

          • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Don’t be daft. You need to protest, demonstrate, educate, and engage in outreach and community building, and then when it’s time to vote, you need to vote strategically. Calling everyone a literal fascist that’s even a half-shuffle right of Bakunin isn’t going to help you.

            • orrk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I’m sorry, are the republicans not literally engaging in fascism? I mean, they check almost every box

              • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Your comment implied that you lumped Democratic politicians into that as well.

                And no, not all Republicans are fascists. However, there are currently very, very few principled Republicans that are currently serving at a national level, and more and more are getting forced out by the party. John McCain and Mittens Romney were both Republican based on their political principles, and, while I disagreed with their politics, I don’t believe that either of them could fairly be labelled as fascists. But one is dead, and the other is now out of politics, sooo…

                • orrk@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Oh, I’m sorry, but in a two party system (something that anything not proportional voting will never be), people refusing to vote letting the fascists win does not in fact mean the other party is fascist as well.

                  Secondly, i rightfully don’t give two flying fucks if you feel like republican politician X Y or Z is fascist or not, they have been engaging in fascist rhetoric and ideology for over 50 years, just because they have gone more mask off about it under Trump doesn’t mean the party of “Mexicans are scary”, “blacks are all criminals”, “tough on crime”, “gay should be illegal”, “unquestioning patriotism”, “Judaeo Christian nation” etc… haven’t been fascist, they still very much fit any definition outside literally being part of the Italian Fascisti party.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      A part of me, a part I buried because I didn’t want to believe Trump would win, but… a part of me had basically accepted that she already lost when she brought out the “Bernie Bro.” narrative, and actually tried to paint Bernie Sanders as this misogynist and pretend that his supporters just “Hated women”

      Not only was it a desperate move that revealed a lot of negative things about her character. Honestly even if it was true (and it was!), the “Basket full of deplorables” line definitely scared off Centrists who weren’t fully lucid of just how dangerous Trump was… A close friend of mine who hated both candidates and planned to stay home actually voted Trump solely because a candidate was willing to say people who didn’t vote for her were straight up evil… (I begged him not to, but politics is the one thing he will never listen to me on) Between Deplorables and Bernie Bros. it gave off the impression that she was a spoiled brat who demonized anyone who didn’t faun over her. (Even though Trump demonized everyone who didn’t faun over him, but let’s be honest men and women are held to very different standards)

      The talk about how “It’s my turn!” didn’t help, and the fact that Hillary already tried the “Oh they support that guy because they’re too sexist to support me!” card, and failed miserably, when she brought out the “Obama Boys” line back in 2008.

      Hillary is a geniunely unpleasant person, Trump is also a genuinely unpleasant person, the problem is… and I hate to say it, Trump had more charisma. He didn’t have a way with words or anything like that (Hamberders, covfefe), but he had the persona of a no nonsense businessman ready to trim the fat and say “You’re Fired!” to anyone who stood in the way…

      Hillary…was just Hillary.

      I’m not saying Trump was this novel idea or this cult of personality (Pretty much everyone but his most extreme base hates him)

      I’m saying Hillary is so unworkable as a candidate and so horrifically distasteful, that she may have been the only one who could lose an election to the walking punchline that thanks to the failure of the electoral college, is also the most dangerous man in the West… Donald J. Trump

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The DNC showed voters exactly what they think of leftists when they shafted Bernie for Hillary. They showed their voters exactly what they think of them when they went to court to have it ruled that their voters aren’t shit. At some point, you don’t get to ShockedPikachu anymore that people aren’t supporting you.

      Democrat voters are just as bad, look in any thread about elections, and they make two arguments in the same comment. 1- Leftists are stupid babies who will never be taken seriously and need to STFU already like the stupid babies they are, 2- Leftists who didn’t vote Dem because we call them stupid babies are single handedly behind every Republican win.

      I’ve had a number of Democrats in this thread reply to me who (supposedly) do dnc volunteer work. Who pay lip service to welcoming leftists for half a sentence to pretend they welcome leftists, but then have spent half the day raging and manifesto-ing. How they tell them all to fuck off for showing up during an election year. How they chastise and bully them into oblivion for coming in due to interest in an issue that isn’t the DNC talking point of the year.

      They’ve all thrown around the shtick that leftists don’t come out to help because they’re insert your favorite chronic internet user trope here, and not a one is open to the fact that it turns out people don’t want to work with you or help you if you just spend your days insulting them for not agreeing with you.

      In 2016, they went to court to tell their voters they don’t owe them shit. In 2024, we’re watching Biden sidestep Congress to fund genocide. DNC supporters are openly and actively hostile to anybody left of Biden (on a functional level, moreso than they are Republicans even.) Democrats are just the mid right to Trumps far right, autocrats who think that a pride pin in their cap makes them The Good Guys.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Honestly I’m really tired of “woke shit”

        I don’t mean I’m tired of “women and minorities in my vidya games”, I mean at this point I think I prefer outright bigots to a passive aggressive neolib who thinks that I need to sniff his farts with a smile on my face simply because he wore a rainbow on his t-shirt that one time in June.

        I just don’t understand why I, as a transwoman, live in a world where I hear that something is “Pro-LGBT”, only to find that it’s the most forced, tone deaf, and ironically extremely homophobic/transphobic god damn thing I’ve ever seen in my life. That’s not new, I tend to avoid movies tagged as being “LGBT”, because I know it’s going to be some overdramatic tryhard bullshit likely written by a cis white guy looking for an easy payday.

        Now webcomics and indie animations tagged as being LGBT are fucking awesome, mostly because they were made by actual queer individuals who know that I wanna see big daddy werebears who love each other more than I wanna see another “Feel good teenage drama” where every line is predictable, right up to the ending where the lead comes out as gay, and all of his friends “Come out” as… whatever the movie wants me to think is weird and embarrassing… or another “We’ve got gays in our trailer! But in the actual movie it’s Cishet shit outside of that one scene with the blink and you miss it lesbian kiss that we’re cutting out of the international film”… or another where the gay character is actually present throughout the movie but EVERY LINE serves only to remind us of how totally gay they are…

        This is the kind of “woke shit” I’m mad at, people screaming about how Pro-LGBT/Pro-Black/Pro-Woman they are to the point, where it starts to come off as the exact opposite. I don’t care that you “support me” or that have a “I met God, she’s black” bumpersticker on your car, I just want the GOP to stop gleefully pushing America to Far Right Extremism until they reach the point where they can throw me into a concentration camp and the local news is legally required to talk about how I deserved it, because they’ll be “fined by the Supreme Court” if they don’t. The Neo Liberal’s empty platitudes mean nothing to me.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I love how the day after the election it was all “Russia pushed fake news on social media and confused the voters!” Which it turns out there was some of that, it was such an obvious scapegoat to avoid publicly admitting you botched the campaign that badly. 2016 was such a shit show

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Additionally, the GOP had been putting in the effort to crush her for decades. She was the least-electable candidate the DNC ever put forward by a landslide.

        Trump didn’t have the same level of loyalty back then. He would have failed against any other candidate in 2016.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          I keep telling people that, Hillary was literally the one person Trump could win against.

          It’s why I knew he wouldn’t be re-elected unless he pulled something. His base thinks that Trump is unbeatable because the “White House is trying to prosecute him for crimes they made up, the more obvious the Witch Hunt the more invulnerable he is!”, but it’s clearly echo chamber bullshit, guy’s been a walking punchline since day one… he’s just one that’s no longer funny because he’s threatening our lives.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The way there was zero talk about it until about a day and a half after the election (just long enough to hold some emergency meetings and get some approvals then align on the strategy) I have a suspicion it was a known secret and they decided out some known agents as a scapegoat for the abysmal failure of the DNC. Y’know keep your enemies closer and all.

    • 5in1k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      cough Michigan cough. Bitch took us for granted. The DNC shit the whole bed that election.

      • SaiPenguin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Did a gendered insult help make your point?

        Edit: this is perhaps the most “controversial” thing I’ve posted online and just wanted to say it is an odd thrill to have random internet strangers having a negative reaction to something you said. Brains are strange.

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ya know, getting on each other’s throats because our words aren’t nice enough is a part of how this mess started.

          • SaiPenguin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            I see what you’re saying but if my comment would be considered getting on someone’s throat than I think it may be time to take a step back and take a deep breath.

        • 5in1k@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Ok then her dipshit ass campaign took my state for granted, barely campaigned here, and lost Michigan and the election. The dumb fucking DNC gave up on any election that wasn’t federal after Obama and that didn’t help the fucking idiots either.

          • SaiPenguin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Haha, no, I don’t think so, but I’ve definitely been wrong before :) I guess it’s been something I’ve been trying to ask myself and felt like a valid thing to ask here.

    • Xanis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I do agree. However, we tend to talk a lot and point fingers even more. So rather than us not unifying and speaking up on issues, us not stepping up in the districts and States we live in, and us chirping away and generating white noise on the internet, how about we reverse course?

      Run in your local elections. Organize unions. Start working to bring your and our communities together. Bernie proved it was possible. One of the biggest, if not the biggest, grassroots movements in memory. Could you imagine if we took that unification and built on those foundations after that election cycle so many years ago? We would, in this moment, have a powerful, nationwide voice and platform powered by the very same people who now speak loudly almost daily and take no real action.

      Voting is just the end result of thousands or tens of thousands of hours of effort across the nation. We could literally be doing so much more. Together we are strong and despite the incredible malicious and absolute idiocy that is MAGA, you gotta give them this: They work together. Even if moving in this case is more defined by a herd of drunk cows stumblpeding across a field.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You’ve got to at least try to appeal your base. And no, “vote for me or you’ll get the other guy” is not an inspiring rally cry. It didn’t work in 2016 and the fact that the message seems to be similar in 2024 has me really worried.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well no. Hillary was a center-right candidate. If she wanted votes from progressives or left-wing voters, she knew exactly what to do. But she threw those votes away, relying on rhetoric like this post. We all saw it happening, and she did it anyway. What if she had pushed for universal health care, or unions, or campaign finance reform, or gun laws, or against wars? It would have been an exciting election.

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    I voted for the greater good in 2016 - in the Democratic primaries.

    I voted for the lesser evil in the general election, then took a long hot shower.

    Things would have certainly worked out better with a Hillary victory instead of the Trumpster fire we got.

    This does not excuse the horseshit shenanigans that were going on within the DNC.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because America isnt voting for change. They’re just moving towards fascism, either slow or fast.

      If you tell anyone to change course and vote third party they get really mad at you here on Lemmy.

    • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      6 months ago

      Hence educating and organizing the other 364 days of the year.

      • EightBitBlood@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think a better strategy is to run for office rather than vote. Because voting doesn’t do much if the available candidates are turncoats or shills. It should be educate, organize, and run. Otherwise we get more Scinemas running for raising minimum wage and not at all voting for it when it counts most.

        • harmsy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          6 months ago

          I’d say the people who voted third party are the ones who fucked around in 2016, and ALL of us found out because of it.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Dictatorship it is then. 3rd parties don’t stand a snowballs chance in hell right now.

          Canvassing and outreach happen first, then you can vote for that party. Right now you’re literally handing Republicans the win if you vote 3rd party this election.

        • PugJesus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          Dems deciding to fuck around and find out…

          Yeah! Sending minorities to concentration camps will really show those Dems!

          • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Punch up not down. Democrat leadership decides on policy, Democrat leadership decides on election strategy.

            “I won’t vote for leader that heinous thing x” is a reasonable position to have. “I will vote for leader that doesn’t heinous thing y” is also a reasonable position to have.

            The compromise isn’t to get people to vote for x, it’s for the leader to stop x. Particularly, if the opponent would do x but worse. That only shows, to the Democrat leader, y is a resonable cost for x.

            • PugJesus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              6 months ago

              “I won’t vote for leader that does heinous long-standing thing that most of the electorate agrees with even though the only other viable candidate wants to pursue an even worse policy on the issue!” is just “I support heinous long-standing thing getting worse!” with extra steps.

              • Fedegenerate@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                Except those that don’t vote to support the thing can’t be said to support the thing at all. “Those that didn’t support the thing are the same as those that wanted it more” is self-serving at best and intellectually dishonest at worst. By the same token I wouldn’t suggest anyone that votes Democrat supports anything the Democrats do because that would also be self serving at best and intellectually dishonest at worst.

                I get you’ve had these arguments before, I’ve certainly read them, and I’m not trying to rehash them.

                The point that I’m tying, and failing I suppose, to make is the frustration/anger is misplaced.

      • gun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        6 months ago

        So 88% of Bernie supporters did.

        Leftists did vote for Hillary in 2016.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          41
          ·
          6 months ago

          Its funny to see folks lose their shit at Bernie Voters, when the far larger block of votes Hillary lost came from Obama voters.

          Specifically, 4.4M Obama voters slept through 2016, primarily in the Midwest, in response to Hillary’s failure to campaign or advocate for their interests during her time as Sec State and on the trail.

          A campaign that absolutely obsessed over winning the Deep South, dumping millions into state coffers from South Carolina to Arizona, virtually ignored the pivotal swing Great Lakes states and ceded that territory to Trump.

          Combine this with the Dem Party’s chronic inability to advance any meaningful election reform (no DC statehood, no national motor-voter or mail-in ballot protection laws, no effort to beef up the DOJ’s civil rights department or overturn felony disenfranchisement, no constitutional ballot initiatives to repeal the electoral college, nothin’, nothin’, nothin’) with a SIXTY VOTE SENATE SUPERMAJORITY, and she was lead straight to the slaughter in November.

          Like, if you really want to say who stabbed Hillary in the back in 2016, it was the same guy who kicked her legs out in 2008. Obama failed to secure a national majority of Democrats through the end of his second term. And his successor paid the price (along with everyone else who hate to eat Trump’s bullshit for four years).

          • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            6 months ago

            it really illustrates the enormous amount of entitlement the clinton wing had to expect a win out of that campaign where they alienated every one they could at damn near every turn.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Combine this with the Dem Party’s chronic inability to advance any meaningful election reform

            Ftfy. Biden almost passed universal 3-k (effectively state-funded daycare) which was far more than I ever expected and would have been a boon for my family. He nearly got student loan forgiveness passed which also would’ve been a boon for my family. Honestly most of his campaign promises which he was unable to deliver on would have directly put me in a brilliant financial position right now and instead I’m on a far slower path to get to where I want to be financially thanks to BS political infighting.

            Now that Biden is pissing off everyone by ignoring the fact that most Americans seem to hate seeing orphaned children pulled from rubble in Gaza he’s pretty damn likely to lose the election he was a shoe in to win just 6 months ago.

            Ultimately we have broken promises more thousands of dead children than I can think about in Gaza due to Biden’s unwavering support of Israel, and while there is actual good one can point to (Biden’s IRA and infrastructure bills both have wildly turbocharged both passenger rail and renewable energy projects to a degree that is hard to believe, and the new Income Driven Repayment plan for student loans is extremely lenient) for the average American there is nothing they can point to that Biden did for them in the short term.

          • turmacar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Diminishing returns.

            Complaining that 12% of a sub-group of a sub-group of a population didn’t vote the way you wanted is worrying about open portholes on the Titanic.

            You are never going to get 100% agreement on… basically anything. 88% of group X voting the way you want is literally more people agreeing with you than Dentists agreeing toothpaste is important. (4 out of 5 dentists recommend = 80%)

          • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            6 months ago

            Over 80% of the 12% of Bernie voters that went to Trump were conservatives or centrists, not leftists. The leftists voted for Hillary, Bernie was just more likeable across the board.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              What’s even more hypocritical is that they will turn right around and say that we need centrist candidates to get right wing voters. If that were actually true, wouldn’t that mean that even more Hillary supporters wouldn’t have voted for Bernie if he won the nomination? They want to have it both ways.

              Bernie was the better candidate for the general. The 2016 election was bungled in the primary, not the general, and the argument they are making tacitly admits it.

              • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yep, it’s just massaging of words because for liberals, they get to vote for exactly what they want.

          • kofe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re getting down voted for maybe not being the most tactful but I appreciate you calling it out. I sat out in 2016. I haven’t missed a vote since. I hope others recognize their mistake and pull their weight.

            • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              6 months ago

              It is what it is, its not a mistake if you learn from it. Just made this meme as a response to that dumb ass barney meme someone posted earlier.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s normal for some amount of primary supporters in a contested primary to not vote for the eventual candidate. 88% of us did vote for Hillary - which, ironically, is more than Hillary supporters in '08 voted for Obama.

        The issue here isn’t leftists, or what passes for them in the US, not holding our noses, by and large.

  • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Copying and pasting my own comment from another thread:

    If you want leftists to vote for dems, despite dems pissing on leftists at every possible chance and yelling at leftists to fall in line, I’ll show you how.

    1. Point out that voting will never, ever, ever move the democrat party to the left. You cannot vote the party harder to the left.

    2. Point out that Republicans are going to remain fascists.

    3. Point out that voting third party is a spoiler vote and will result in fascists winning.

    4. Point out that the actual way to move to the left is to unionize and organize at the grassroots level, to apply bottom-up pressure on the top.

    The answer is not to pretend that Biden is anything other than a Neoliberal Capitalist. Leftists will correctly point out that Biden is still a lukewarm neoliberal maintaining the status quo, and feel further alienated by being told they should love him anyways. That just encourages voter apathy.

    Additionally, this meme is wrong. Leftists voted, it was the centrists and moderates that didn’t. Hillary wasn’t appealing in any way, so only the people who really cared voted. Hillary still won the popular vote, she just lost the electoral college, and Trump succeeded in riling up the fascist base. Do not blame Leftists for not falling in line for an extremely unlikable candidate, they did regardless. Blame Hillary for doing jack-shit to energize the base.

  • rivermonster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If Obama had fought for his seat, Roe would still be the law. Dems never ever fight. They cry about how they can’t do anything. Even when they have the house, senate, and white house, they couldn’t do anything. Watch the excuses that follow this comment.

    Neither capitalist party will ever help because they’re both avowed capitalists.

    Vote dem, move right slowly. Vote GOP move right fast AF, with added racism, hatred, and Christo-fascist oppression as well.

    But ultimately, NO capitalist party will ever fix anything in this shit two party system. Both parties get all their campaign donations from the same billionaires., and companies.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Vote dem, move right slowly. Vote GOP move right fast AF, with added racism, hatred, and Christo-fascist oppression as well.

      It comes down to that the DNC/ DCCC and their voters are fundamentally not aligned in terms of incentives and priorities, and most discussant in places like this simply do not appreciate that. Whereas, the GOP and their voter base,are at least aligned, on their priorities and at least dubiously on incentives. This is demonstrated by their ability to provide for their voters once in office. You can and should hate what the priorities of the GOP are, however, you shouldn’t deny that they deliver for their voters when it comes time to do so. They make their voters priorities a priority once elected, and work their asses off to get these shitty, inhumane policies into place.

      The DNC/DCCC have historically treated their voters as an inconvenience, in a very technocratic, “we’re the experts, we know better” fashion. Its a kind of anti-populism that was best expressed in the Hillary campaign, but also in how Obama ran his administration. To the DNC/DCCC, their voters are an inconvenience at best. Frankly, they’d probably prefer having a rightwing base, because they would better align with their actual prioritize. The result is that when elected, DCCC candidates don’t work or fight for the things they campaigned on, because they truly don’t think those things are priorities. This trickles down into a lack of results to their base, causing them to struggle because they consistently fail to deliver for the people that vote for them.

      Edit because I wanted to highlight some things…

      Observe the difference:

      Hillary on the trail, 2016: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MN6iwqthZrU

      Hillary takes the position of “knowing better”, that the protesters need to basically sit down and shut up.

      Bernie on the trail, 2016: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gjt56Tdhhqk

      Bernie gives them the mic and the time to get their message across.

      • rivermonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        In my lifetime, a dem only ever once gave me something to vote FOR, and I actively campaigned for him-Obama. And the first thing he did was give up on universal care and then even on public option. But he’s making millions by leveraging his presidency, so he’s a good little capitalist.

        And the banks still appreciate him vailing them out while ficking us all and all our municipalities, etc.

      • rivermonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        And they have helped over and over to disable democracy and reduce the ability of citizens to affect change over monied interests who buy Thomas his motor home and other “gifts” (spelled bribes). And Scalia, and the others…

  • licherally@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    More like of rbg hadn’t been so stubborn and had actually stepped down when Obama was in office, we wouldn’t have a republican majority on the supreme Court.

      • licherally@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because neoliberalism and republicanism are both terrible, and because the DNC is crooked as fuck

    • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, she totally should’ve stepped down so Obama could appoint… checks notes… Merrick Garland. Oh fuck, never mind I see her point

      Did anyone ever pay attention to most of the people Obama appointed to his cabinet? They were like hand-picked by Wall Street lobbyists.

        • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Obviously not. Wtf? You think someone who criticizes Obama for being a weak politician would support Clinton, a much tougher politician even more committed to neoliberalism? I see no reason to think she wouldn’t have wanted to appoint someone like Garland as well.

          • licherally@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Well I mean that is literally the point of the meme we are all commenting under right now, so yes that is what I thought you were saying…

    • DrPop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Didn’t the Republicans stonewall approving a supreme Court justice for 18 months so that their guy, Trump, could appoint one. Then when rgb died they just ignored everything they did and said because they were in charge.

  • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is just another version of vote blue no matter who. It’s just as dumb as people who only vote Republican. Trump didn’t win that election, Hillary lost it.

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    if Leftists had voted for Hillary in 2016 abortion would still be legal.

    So, this really isn’t true in any meaningful way. People like to make a big deal out of the 12% of Bernie voters who went for Trump, but the majority of them identified as conservatives or centrists, while only 18% identified as liberal or left-leaning. Likewise, a lack of turnout doesn’t seem to be the issue; black voter turnout dropped, but not by an unexpected margin, and young voters (who tend to be more left-leaning) had very strong turnout. Finally, you could try to blame leftists who voted third-party, but analysis shows that even if every single Jill Stien voter had gone to Clinton, she still would have needed to win over 50% of Gary Johnson’s voters (who were obviously unlikely to consider themselves leftists).

    You might be able to get the numbers to work if you say that if every leftist who stayed home OR voted third-party OR went to Trump voted for Clinton she’d have won, but that’s incredibly hard to prove and probably relies on some specious assumptions (for example, that every Green Party voter was a disgruntled Democrat). At that point, you’re pulling so many different groups together under a single banner that it’s basically meaningless. You might as well say if women had voted for Hillary abortion would be legal.

  • bababooey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Isn’t the entire job of campaigning politicians to convince people to vote for them?