• Revan343@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The precedent is that he doesn’t need to be convicted of insurrection for the insurrection clause to apply.

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can be guilty of something without being guilty of something. Thats an interesting way to frame it. What is the precedent here?

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        What is the precedent here?

        Former Confederates were barred from holding public office regardless of whether they were actually charged with treason, or anything else