Was really surprised to see the difference in fumbles.

  • Tua: 3177 yards passing, 69.8%, 4 fumbles lost
  • Allen: 2875 yards passing, 69.6%, 3 fumbles lost
  • silentkiller082@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    All I see are two elite QBs that people love to hate on because the league has either shoved them down their throats or people don’t like to be proven wrong about being good or not. Chances are if you compare your QB against Tua or Josh they aren’t as good as them with a few exceptions to that.

    • RiveryJerald@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a good thing to point out - these days the hating/anti-fan energy (maybe because we’re all terminally online to some degree) is much stronger than I remember in past eras. For example, it feels like fans of other teams (that have nothing to do with the Bills) will hate on Josh Allen as much/more than I did Tom Brady.

      …But Tom Brady made my team his bitch for the better part of two decades. So I’d like to think my hate was more justified.

      • jetpack_operation@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        For example, it feels like fans of other teams (that have nothing to do with the Bills) will hate on Josh Allen as much/more than I did Tom Brady.

        This is probably confirmation bias, like your take definitely is, but from my perspective, this is absolutely no fucking way in hell Josh Allen gets more hate than Tom Fucking Brady did from 31 other fanbases.

        • RiveryJerald@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Agreed - I replied to someone else making that point re: confirmation bias which is definitely a part of it. Re-framing the sentiment I have slightly - with Brady I at least get it because, if for no other reason, people probably got sick of him. The Allen hate I don’t really get because (and yeah, definitely wearing the fan bias here) he seems like a nice enough chap and frankly hasn’t yet been shoved in everyone’s faces yet to really elicit the “Man, I’m fucking sick of this guy yet.”

      • jonnystargaryen@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I would say this is almost entirely down to a combination of you potentially having more nfl discourse online, which leads to more polarizing opinions. Then the bigger part is your own biases. Nothing wrong with it, Allen is your guy so you’re more likely to remember all the bad stuff said about him. I can promise you he is no where near actually being hated at the same level as Brady lol

        • RiveryJerald@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          For sure, I’d acknowledge it’s a bias thing to a degree. I should’ve phrased myself a bit better in my previous - what throws me off re: the Allen hate is like…he hasn’t done anything yet to really deserve it? Like with Brady, I mean when a guy is in that many Super Bowls and conference championship games, I totally get people getting sick of him.

          And I just ignore the “he’s overrated” contingent because you don’t watch football if you think Allen is overrated.

  • Bobblefighterman@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    >Was really surprised to see the difference in fumbles.

    i’m not. Any of our RBs not named Achane or Mostert will practically hand the ball over to the defense, and our center isn’t even a center, leading to wild throws to the QB that he inevitably fumbles.

  • varnell_hill@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It just shows you the power of narrative. I’ve heard Tua mentioned as a potential MVP while no one is saying that about Josh Allen and some are even calling him washed.

    And not derail the thread, but a similar thing happens with Brock Purdy. He’s currently out performing some pretty good QBs (and handily) yet somehow some people are convinced he’s worse than all of them.

    It’s weird.

    • TheYoungLung@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because many of Tua’s fumbles are because of bad snaps and other weird issues. For example yesterday he put the ball right in the chest of the 4th string rb and the guy dropped it. That fumble stat goes to Tua.

      Don’t get me wrong he’s had some bone headed moments with poor ball security but ever fumble has definitely not been his fault

    • OttawaFisherman@alien.topOPB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It seems like it takes a couple years before people will admit a low drafted QB is actually good. I bet by next year that narrative will be completely shifted and people will finally recognize Purdy as one of the best

    • elbenji@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean hurts has similar turnover numbers and TD numbers and the front runner

    • Kundrew1@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Dolphins are in first place, the Bills are currently missing the playoffs. Players on successful teams always get more accolades.

    • Impossibills@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s because people haven’t seen his interceptions. Most have been when a drive is gonna die anyway and he’s throwing an arm punt

      Also he has 5 interceptions that aren’t his fault at all

      Despite having one of the lowest turnover worthy throw rates people say he is turnover prone

      • MassKhalifa@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Our game against y’all from last year isn’t helping the narrative, either. Fumble on his own goal line late in the 4th and an INT in the end zone in overtime. I think that’s sticking in people’s memories.

  • doyouunderstandlife@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    A good chunk of Tua’s fumbles are from snaps because Connor Williams is not a good snapper (great blocker however). A couple of other fumbles have also occurred on direct hand-offs that were given directly to the RBs but just never secured (I think those were attributed to Tua, but idk for sure). There was also a weird backwards pass on a bad play call against Carolina that went out of bounds for a loss.

    Out of all the fumbles, I think about 2-3 were legit strip sacks, and one was a fumble on a QB run.

  • TheRatchetTrombone@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Many of the turnovers were in lower stakes games and moments while many of Allen’s are him pulling a Brett Favre and costing him games. Plus, we have been superior in running the ball. Fuck outta here trying to prop up Allen as unlucky. He’s a turnover god of a gunslinger. He’s not going to change.

      • AleroRatking@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not on dropped snaps missed handoffs. Offensive predominantly recover those.

        Also there is luck with interceptions as well but this isn’t including dropped interceptions. It’s using inconsistent metrics.

    • I_HateToSayAtodaso@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Fumbles lost are literally right below the title. You had to click on the title to get into the thread, actively ignore that the context you’re asking for is there and then make this comment.

      • AleroRatking@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Correct. I point that out. Fumbles lost should be in the title not in the comment section. The title is using inconsistent metrics to make a disingenuous point

          • AleroRatking@alien.topB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The title is pushing an inconsistent narrative. They could have made the same point using fumbles lost. Or they could have made a point of turnover worthy plays which actually helps Allens case even more.