Just a reminder to the people saying to get MHJ and figure out the qb situation later just how little an all time great, if not the greatest wide receiver ever, has on winning if you don’t have a decent quarterback. As great as MHJ might be the return he offers isn’t even a fraction to as much as if Maye or Caleb end up being great or even just good. The potential return on investment is just too much to pass up with a qb draft this highly touted.
If the Bears have a top 2 pick they aren’t even going to consider MHJ, the only chance is if the Panthers drop to 3 or later where you consider him and then a qb later with our pick.
Where did dude suggest that rookie QB would win a QB?
And how did the Rams do before they got Stafford.
A great QB is a (nearly always) a necessary but not sufficient ingredient to win a SB.
Where in my post do I say this?
That doesn’t imply a rookie QB will win a QB (guessing you meant Super Bowl?) - you need an entire team and Rams are an example of building the entire team first before grabbing a QB capable of winning a SB. DET is an example of grabbing a QB capable of winning a SB but not putting the rest of the team around the QB and seeing 0 playoff wins because of that.