• troofinesse@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    A sack is not as bad as a pick (duh). Teams get sacked more than they throw picks. The article is claiming that in 2019, all the sacks in total hurt teams more than all the picks.

    However, I do think a fair bit of fans don’t realize how bad sacks are. Since they very often lead to increased punter playing time

    • porkbellies37@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      We can quibble a bit on this, but let’s just say a sack is worse than a risky throw.

      I’m not sure if this is a collected stat, but the ratios of fumbles per sack or fumbles lost per sack would likely underscore this. And a fumble behind the line of scrimmage is almost always worse than a pick.

      • troofinesse@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Honestly, whatever. Risky pass thing is an interesting and generally more correct way to look at it. And I can’t agree more that the Bears should let young QBs sink or swim with a ton of passes a game