• Dimok@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I said that… Those would be the people she still worked with that were pissy she narced… Taco bells job is to provide a safe work environment, which they did by offering to move her to another location to combat this.

        • Dimok@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not strategy bud, that’s American workplace law. Not sure what you do in your country, but here when there are claims of harassment, you provide a safe work environment. Obviously since claims of harassment are hard to substantiate unless there are eye witnesses or video evidence, moving them to a location they couldn’t be harassed was the best idea. Not sure how you equate whatever you are trudging up with the Catholics to this workplace issue. Sounds a bit idiotic to me but…whatever.

            • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              No. Terminating the harasser is the proper thing to do. And contact local law enforcement if there was any criminal conduct.

              Moving the harasser means they’ll continue their actions somewhere else.

              • Dimok@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is indeed the correct thing to do, if the harassment can be verified or is at a level that merits such termination. I once was involved in a disciplinary case where a group of unionized employees claimed one employee was harassing them by having a bad odor every day. They put to their steward that this was a hostile work environment. I documented several times where I personally talked to the employee, never smelt a thing. Should I have fired or moved that employee? A lot of people here make quite a few assumptions on the extremely limited info provided…

            • Dimok@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Umm, no. Someone being forced to move to a different location based on accusations is about as silly as firing them over accusations. They can and will file a complaint with the state labor board. Have any of you actually worked before…?

                • Dimok@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s cool. When you do get into the workforce, you’ll find it’s never as black and white as it seems. I’ve run into just as many people claiming victim when in reality they are the problem. Not saying that is the case with this person, but moving everyone that they claim is harassing them is foolish and leaves your company open to retaliation claims. Now you know.

                  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m over 60 and have worked since I was 12. You don’t know shit about my experiences but are arrogant enough to think otherwise.

                    Now you know.

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is moving the victim even remotely the same as that?