TurnerJ5@alien.topB to Chicago Bears@nfl.communityEnglish · 1 year agoCHIBears Weekly Chat Threadmessage-squaremessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareCHIBears Weekly Chat ThreadTurnerJ5@alien.topB to Chicago Bears@nfl.communityEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareSoldier-Fields@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agohttps://reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/181i0jk/adjusted_passer_rating_wk11/ Fields is higher than I’d expect. He’s definitely benefiting in stats like ANY/A, Passer Rating, & TD% because of his low volume though.
minus-squareRex-Jay-Fields__Stan@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat’s a fair point but on the flip side this doesn’t include his rushing contributions (which are meaningful). I don’t think it’s necessarily inflated based on the eye test
minus-squarewhatever12347@alien.topBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThis doesn’t count sacks though.
https://reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/181i0jk/adjusted_passer_rating_wk11/
Fields is higher than I’d expect. He’s definitely benefiting in stats like ANY/A, Passer Rating, & TD% because of his low volume though.
That’s a fair point but on the flip side this doesn’t include his rushing contributions (which are meaningful). I don’t think it’s necessarily inflated based on the eye test
This doesn’t count sacks though.