In the last couple of months I have noticed an increasing trend of supplying me search results that are completely unrelated to the current query and tie back to my location or previous searches. I can say this with a high degree of certainty this is without a doubt beyond the 100th instance this has happened.

My browser is configured against tracking and fingerprinting (in fact all my devices are) which would make it fairly difficult to retain any data unless they are profiling me.

  • sar1n
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve also noticed that if you do a search, click a result, then hit back to go back to the results they manipulate the results in some weird way so they’re not the exact same results you got the first time. Infuriating

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 months ago

    Odd. I wonder what is going on here because when I search that exact same query I get accurate results.

    I’ve had iffy search results before but never anything that bad.

    • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I also returned totally accurate results using the exact same query. I would really like to know what is going on here. This is a common complaint with some people using DDG, that the results are poor, but I consistently have as good if not better results than using Google.

  • devbo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 months ago

    great. i finally get off google and now duckduckgo is bad. i hate the internet.

      • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        So like… all Searx instances are independent, but I can save my preferences in a reproducible query string? Or like… how’s this a long-term, easy, good move for me? (I know ≈nothing).

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You can do it that way if you grab that URL from the “cookies” section. Otherwise, it can save your preferences in a cookie.

          • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Thanks!

            Do all the Searx instances generate and keep independent indexes of the entire internet, or is it more like Lemmy (where, maybe, each instance is a window into the entirety of the index)?

    • solidsnake2085@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Kagi was my favorite but their pricing model is a little too high still. If it was $5 for 500 searches I would do that but the unlimited for $10 is just a bit too high for me.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I get that not everyone has extra cash to spend. I’m very fortunate to be able to throw $10 at a problem. I don’t begrudge you if you need to save cash (I have no kids to raise, for example). But I think $10 is fair if you search a bunch. Maybe I’m overvaluing it; I have heard great things about Kagi, but I’m still fucking around on Google cause it’s “good enough,” even though it’s in great decline. Fuck it, I’m a hypocrite.

  • mtchristo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It has been doing this shit for a while. Returning results based on just one key word out of many keywords from my query.

    Lately they have been even ignoring the restrictive +“keyword” syntax and returning whatever shit just so they won’t admit their (or Microsoft’s indexer) is shit

    • DetectiveSanity@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s not the fact that there are filler results that bothers me, after all there might not be results for everything we may possibly search.

      It’s the fact that these are links to services which have a tie to my unique identifiers which I deliberately declined access to in all available ways!

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    What would we suggest as a realistic alternative? Sears? Startpage? Brave? (I am no expert by the way, just looking for tips)

    • currycourier@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I just switched to using Kagi recently and I like it a lot so far! Theres a free tier for 100/searches a month you can use to figure out if you like it.

      • Vexz@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Me too. I was so reluctant to pay for a search engine at first since there are good alternatives out there I don’t have to pay for. But I just at least wanted to try the first 100 free searches and was blown away by how great it is. It has some unique features like prioritizing or blocking specific domains, lenses and custom bangs. I payed the $10 the same day for Pro tier and 5 days later (yesterday) I even upgraded to Ultimate tier with ChatGPT-4 (called Kagi Assistant). I really, really enjoy Kagi so far. Most probably it’s gonna be my one and only search engine for the next years to come.

    • coughrelief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Searx sucks for images in my experience, startpage was bought by an advertising company, brave is weird for a multitude of reasons but I don’t know how good their search engine is as I’ve never tried it

      However I do think that finding a searx instance that works for you and then using another engine like ddg for images is the way to go… You could add a shortcut like “.ddg garbage truck” for easily searching with for example ddg on firefox

    • Timber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve been using metager for some while and really like it. They’re also part of an initiative pushing for a free as in freedom search index, so that’s nice

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I get the same shit at work where I can’t use a VPN: like 7-8 relevant results then basically just ads for local businesses after that.

  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have still the same good results in ddg, no matter what device or browser. I have noticed that they have some location bias when ddg (and any other search engine i have tried) has non good results globaly but good resulta locally.

    Still better then anything i have tested. Just because there are minor anomalies i will stick with them.

    • Liome@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It does though? Right under the search bar there should be a switch bar to turn on localized search, and a dropdown to pick different location.
      Or is it itself location locked?

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    On DDG I can type in an exact company or product name and not get a proper result, it’s crazy. Google seems to find the stuff no problem, it’s really quite frustrating when the search engine isn’t even capable of basic queries.

  • TheHolyChecksum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes, I have the same issue with DDG for something like a year now. I can’t use it anymore for basic searches, I feel like the bing api they are using is getting worse and worse.

  • somedude@lemmy.ninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you’re looking for a new search engine, I’ve been using paid search provider, Kagi.com, for the last few months. They’ve been great.

    • DetectiveSanity@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Slowly but surely I am coming to the realisation that free services sooner or later will drift away from their privacy claims

      • somedude@lemmy.ninja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Precisely. Ad and user data supported products will always balance making their users happy, with making their paying customers happy.

    • Jin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Pricing seems a bit odd to me What happens if you don’t spend all your searches? Does it carry over to next month?

      Wouldn’t it be better to pay as you go? Without the monthly requirements if they gonna have a limit anyway.

  • rab@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I feel like ddg has never had good search results

  • canihasaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    I paid for Kagi and have been super happy with it. If you don’t mind paying, I highly recommend it. Not having ads or manipulated results is worth it for me.