#Number of Interior linemen (IOL) pass blocking 75+

2018: 41

2019: 28

2020: 16

2021: 16

2022: 19

2023: 8

#Number of Tackles pass blocking 75+

2018: 37

2019: 30

2020: 35

2021: 30

2022: 33

2023: 22

#Number of Edge/DI pass rushing 75+

2018: 33

2019: 42

2020: 46

2021: 42

2022: 43

2023: 44

This is the first year there’s more 75+ pass rushers than 75+ pass blockers.

So after looking into the rules changes before the 2019 season, I’m convinced the elimination of blindside blocks within the pocket was what spurred the large drop from 2018 to 2019. I think IOL still probably got away with it a bit in 2019, but by 2020, no one was doing it anymore, and the pass blocking of IOL dropped as a result. This also explains why pass blocking by tackles was stable and consistent from 2018 to 2019 as tackles rarely had the opportunity/need to execute blindside blocks. I am not sure what has caused the further deterioration of interior line pass blocking from 2022 to this season, but by percentage, it is the biggest single year drop in the years I looked at. I’m inclined to believe that the drop-off in tackle pass blocking this year is due to the severe drop off in IOL pass blocking.

Does anyone have any theories on what is behind the drop in IOL pass blocking this year? I don’t think there were any significant changes in rules this off-season that would impact pass blocking, but maybe I missed something.

I included the amount of pass rushers with a rating of 75+ in pass rushing to show that there was a gap up in 2019 likely due to the blindside block rule, but besides that, it has remained stable and is not up this year despite offensive lines being lower rated this year.

TL:DR trying to figure out why offensive lines are so shitty nowadays and dug through PFF data and found out that it’s specifically IOL pass blocking that’s in the gutter and the decline started in 2019 due to the elimination of blindside blocks.

  • MonsignorHalas@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find the hardest part about film study is understanding the breakdowns around the player that account for the why they might get scored an L on the play. It’s the Brian Urlacher effect to me. Subtract Urlacher and the remaining 10 players are all worse no matter how great their individual scores.

    Take Tevin Jenkins. Now that he’s out there our center play is better. Can we send some of the center’s grade to Jenkins?

    Communication is so important.

    • burrito48@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You bring up a very valid point. Also is not just tevin. Had we had our starting oline healthy for every game there is probably 10-15 plays this year that turn out positive. In this league that is probably 2.5 more wins

      My point for watching film is more of evaluating talent and diagnosis of what went right or wrong on any given play. You can’t win every play but can see which players constantly contribute to losing plays. I played for over 12 years so it’s just habit for me. Understand the average fan doesn’t watch film and is faster just to read grades on PFF and then use these as basis for their analysis

      • roysmallz@alien.topOPB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you’re spot on. In this instance, I was just using the PFF data to support what I’ve seen on the field this year, which is atrocious oline play. I obviously do not have the time to personally review film for every o-line in every game, and understand that PFF has many failings. The only thing I’m confident on is that oline play is significantly below average when compared to the last several years. Why oline play is down could be any number of factors and likely is due to a bunch of different variables.