• in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 days ago

    There is no way to cool them, they’re obsolete in 2 years, less bandwidth than fiber, 5x the price of terrestrial datacenters and they’ll interfere with terrestrial astronomy and GPS/comms sats already up there. What more could we want?

  • 0ndead
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    This whole data center in space idea is such bullshit. It’s just another investor circle jerk.

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 days ago

    Am I dense? Assuming they have some solution to keep them cool is there any meaningful reason you’d want them in space rather than on Earth? Is this just them wanting to stick to the Terminator script and actually have Skynet be in orbit?

  • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 days ago

    This is equal as much a military projekt as starlink was from the start.

    Its about puting decentralized computing into orbit where its hard to reach.

    Massive datacenters on earth are a big target in case of war, even a low tech enemy can take em out.

    Also is reduces latency for AI driven weapons systems on the ground, when the satelite with the computing is right overhead. This means the military ground robot can be cheaper because it needs less computing hardware, that also reduces its energy consumption.

    And like starlink, all this is funded by the DoD, under the guise of a civilian program using a bilionaire as cover…

  • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    They gunna be paying out when these things come falling back to earth and take out houses and shit? 52,000 is absolutely too many to have any faith that hundreds or thousands per year won’t come down all over the planet.