• The four most commonly diagnosed cancers (lung, breast, prostate and colorectal cancers) are expected to account for about 48% of all cancers diagnosed in 2025.

  • It is estimated that 42% of people in Canada will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime

  • Quebec is expected to have the highest cancer incidence rate. British Columbia is expected to have the lowest cancer incidence rate of all the provinces.

  • In the early 1990s, five-year net survival for all cancers combined was only 55%, but estimates show that it has reached 64%.

https://cdn.cancer.ca/-/media/files/cancer-information/resources/publications/canadian-cancer-statistics-2025/2025_pdf_final_en.pdf

  • Binzy_Boi@piefed.caEnglish
    2·
    2 days ago

    Reminder to get an adequate amount of fibre in people. Eat more beans, whole grains, ditch the white bread for whole wheat, etc.

    It’s unfortunate that colorectal cancer rates are increasing because people’s eating habits lacking the fibre they need.

  • somethingDotExe@lemmy.world
    4·
    2 days ago

    Would love to know why the geography has such an impact. When we are talking porcentage, it should be the same across the country?

    • nyan@lemmy.cafeEnglish
      4·
      2 days ago

      In addition to the sampling issues others have mentioned, there may be some environmental issues contributing to the stats—some areas likely have higher levels of radon in the soil, and thus higher levels of radon gas exposure, for instance.

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      2·
      2 days ago

      Its in the pdf. Likely its bad data.

      Differences in cancer rates between provinces and territories could be the result of different risk factors (such as tobacco smoking and obesity), as well as differences in diagnostic practices, data collection and data availability. For example, projections for Quebec are based on data up to 2017, while data up to 2019 were available for other provinces and territories, which could have influenced Quebec’s ranking.

    • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.caEnglish
      1·
      2 days ago

      I’d like to see it broken down into some other categories, as a whole province contains such a variety of people. One would be socioeconomic status - it would be interesting to see the impact that ability to afford quality food has. Habits, activity levels, stress levels would all be fascinating to learn more about.

    • No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca
      1·
      2 days ago

      Probably unrelated to geography, but rather sub-national culture(s), provincial/territorial public health initiatives, and provincial discrepancies in health care delivery.

      Also odd that OP said QC is projected to have the highest rate, when NS, NL and NU are higher. Or why BC was stated lowest when there is a BIG drop in rates for YT