It’s basically child porn and I’m pretty sure we and the admins don’t want to propogate that.

  • Cavemanfreak@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wtf? Federation is a privilege, not a right. If you can’t behave, spread CP or is a hub for nazi shit, you definitely don’t deserve that privilege.

    • AnimusAstralis@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but doesn’t banning an instance because of a single “bad” community hurt the whole platform?

      • HerbErtlinger@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. The instance should moderate its own users. When they allow users to continue abuse, the instance should be blocked. Instances that condone abusive communities hurt the whole platform.

      • Unaware7013@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bruh, that’s literally how you keep yourself from ending up as a Nazi bar. You stomp that shit out and let them know they’re unwanted, or they bring their friends and eventually run off the rest of your clientele.

        Having those bad communities federated is worse for the platform than defederating from instances that propagate that shit. You’re gonna run off more people if you risk getting CSAM or Nazi shit on their feed than you would be excluding instances that have it.

      • meat_popsicle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. An instance that permits and hosts child porn is an inherent risk to federate with. What instance owner could want to federate with them and possibly receive / store CSAM/child porn?

        Also: what instance owner wants to potentially expose their users to that type of content??? It’s globally illegal.