Berlin-based business consultant Matt and his colleague were among the first at their workplace to discover ChatGPT, mere weeks after its release. He says the chatbot transformed their workdays overnight. “It was like discovering a video game cheat,” says Matt. “I asked a really technical question from my PhD thesis, and it provided an answer that no one would be able to find without consulting people with very specific expertise. I knew it would be a game changer.”

Day-to-day tasks in his fast-paced environment – such as researching scientific topics, gathering sources and producing thorough presentations to clients – suddenly became a breeze. The only catch: Matt and his colleague had to keep their use of ChatGPT a closely guarded secret. They accessed the tool covertly, mostly on working-from-home days.

“We had a significant competitive advantage against our colleagues – our output was so much faster and they couldn’t comprehend how. Our manager was very impressed and spoke about our performance with senior management,” he says.

Whether the technology is explicitly banned, highly frowned upon or giving some workers a covert leg up, some employees are searching for ways to keep using generative AI tools discreetly. The technology is increasingly becoming an employee backchannel: in a February 2023 study by professional social network Fishbowl, 68% of 5,067 respondents who used AI at work said they don’t disclose usage to their bosses.

Even in instances without workplace bans, employees may still want to keep their use of AI hidden, or at least guarded, from peers. “We don’t have norms established around AI yet – it can initially look like you’re conceding you’re not actually that good at your job if the machine is doing many of your tasks,” says Johnson. “It’s natural that people would want to conceal that.”

As a result, forums are popping up for workers to swap strategies for keeping a low profile. In communities like Reddit, many people seek methods of secretly circumventing workplace bans, either through high-tech solutions (integrating ChatGPT into a native app disguised as a workplace tool) or rudimentary ones to obscure usage (adding a privacy screen, or discreetly accessing the technology on their personal phone at their desk).

  • Destraight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    can’t use AI to hold 2 pieces of metal together while I weld it. AI is irrelevant to me, and my job is safe

    • alienanimals@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Two years ago…

      can’t use AI to create art. AI is irrelevant to me, and my job is safe -artists

        • alienanimals@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You can Google the quote and find tons of people sharing the same sentiment.

          Hell, I certainly didn’t think AI would be able to create art like it does now just a few years ago. Most people thought AI would take manufacturing jobs long before it took the jobs of artists.

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Haven’t welding robots been a thing for ages? In a few years that bot can do your job, and figure out how to do it more efficiently while it’s doing it.

      • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Somebody said that to me a few years ago, and honestly, I think we’re still a looooong way away from robots being able to weld up repair jobs.

        Sure, they can be used for making mass produced, new items, but a huge amount of welding work is bespoke pieces, or repair jobs. And honestly, building a robot to do that work will be far, far, far more hassle to most employers than simply paying someone to get in there and get it welded. There are just too many variables to take into account for the machinery to be cost effective - right now.

        Of course, a few years down the line, and the robots might have become cheaper to deploy, but they’ll have to be damn cheap for people like my boss who refuses to even buy a few old Android tablets so we can digitise much of the shop floor documentation.

      • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        For large-scale industrial production, yes. It is likely the original commenter is doing custom or fairly small-scale welding, which needs either a much more expensive welding robot, or lots of extra work reconfiguring a still very expensive one. For such applications it is both cheaper and faster to do by hand and likely will be for a long time, though how small scale the practical limit for having a robot will likely decrease over time.

      • Destraight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d like to see a robot try to bend underneath trailers and climb on top of trailers to do my welding job, but guess what? They can’t. So unless you got some Boston dynamic acrobatic bots in stock that are “programmed” to do my job. it will never happen and I have nothing to worry abt

        • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair enough, I hadn’t considered repair job when I wrote that.

          But if I were you, I’d be really careful about that “never”. If you’re old enough, you might have retired by the time your job will be replaced, but it’s going to happen.