• stifle867@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    some leaders now want an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice established without constitutional change or legislation

    What does this mean? I thought one of the campaign points was that due to being included in the constitution it couldn’t be dismantled like it has time and time again previously. Wouldn’t this just be more of the same?

    As disappointing as it is I really don’t see a way forward after losing a popular vote.

    • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      For the pollies, i reckon you’re right, there is no clear way forward. I think it’ll be on the States to take a leading role.

      I heard during the week, the problem with a referendum is its a blunt yes/no answer. So we’ll never really know what people were actually saying no to. Focus groups and surveys will only get us so far. Makes it hard to know where to go next.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly, and when the question posed was open to so much interpretation everyone has their own idea of what they voted yes/no for. It wasn’t like the “gay marriage yes or no” referendum that was clearly understood by most people. Such a mistake to call it “the voice”. Isn’t that a TV show?

        • DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          the “gay marriage yes or no” referendum

          Small nitpick: it was a plebiscite - not a referendum. Our marriage laws aren’t contained in the Constitution, so a referendum wasn’t required.

        • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Haha, it was a mistake to call it the Voice. I’m waiting for the Got Talent commission to get going.

          Unfortunately the nature of the constitution meaned that it needed to be a bit vague. But that was always one of its strengths. Over time, as life changes, the nation isn’t codified into too strict a system. The Voice reflected that essence very well.

    • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They could create an organisation which represents all First Nations Peoples through a series of treaties and just make loud public statements. By being a representation of all First Nations Peoples their opinions would carry some weight.