• sheogorath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    You don’t. If you live where cars are not needed, e.g. Tokyo, you’ll just walk to your nearest small grocer and get the ingredients you need. That’s what I did when I stayed in Japan for work.

    • waow@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Thankfully, my little corner store will remain open during floods and other natural disasters as well as pandemics and such. So it will never be necessary for me to have more than 24 hours worth of food in my house.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      So you have to essentially grocery shop before every meal? That doesn’t sound super efficient. Especially when cooking for a family.

      This also still doesn’t help with throwing like a big party where you need a large amount of food.

      Edit: So yes, all the responses are basically shop every day. I wish I had that kinda time.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I used to buy ingredients for my meals every second day while living in Europe. Always what I wanted or was on sale. No meal planning for the week and making a huge order / weekend mall spree.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It’s super simple. You stop there on your way home. When I was in Berlin, I would generally hit up the grocery store a few times a week. I did not have to worry about produce going bad because it would be used with one of my meals on the next couple of days.

        • Navy@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Or, if we’re changing cities already we could make more accessible homes and public transit. If someone in a wheelchair can’t get onto a train you’ve made the train wrong.

          • Wogi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            I traveled up and down the East Coast with my dad when he was in a wheelchair. Every city was a little different but Amtrak has made their trains this way. A special ramp is needed, which has to be fetched by someone. Baltimore was the worst about it, but they did get us on just fine, and kicked a guy out of the handicapped starting. New York City was incredible. Dude hung out with us until our train showed up and made sure we got on and situated before regular boarding started. Though I think he had dealt with something similar personal and took it upon himself. DC was at about the level you’d expect and was pretty pleasant.

            • Navy@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              Great to hear, that is actually a lot better than I would have expected. It would still be ideal if you could use it as easily as someone not using a wheelchair but we do have to live in the real world and accommodating everyone is complicated and expensive.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          And that really worries me. The government should offer free options for people like that. Uber Eats and Instacart exploits the hell out of people like that.

          • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            And that’s something we can look into, but it’s no reason to stop walkable towns.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              9 months ago

              No one said it was.

              See, I knew one of you motherfuckers was going to come in here and make it obvious you just don’t care about the actual facts, you’ve already made up your minds and seek to make up everyone else’s minds for them.

              Maybe instead of treating every single discussion of anything like an epic shitfight, you all should just pool your money together, buy your own land, incorporate it as a separate county, and build your own walkable cities and leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Because you all are doing nothing but demonstrating for us once again the negativity and childish banality of the human condition, and I’m tired of it.

                  The immaturity, the short-sightedness, the complete lack of empathy or consideration for anyone who disagrees with you – you all are attacking people, not just me, who are calling out walkable cities for being unviable for disabled people. One stupid motherfucker here even suggested people like that use delivery services to get their groceries instead of being able to drive, knowing Instacart and Uber Eats exploits the disabled and isn’t available everywhere. No consideration that it’s unfair for disabled people who can’t walk far regardless. No consideration that what you want isn’t completely viable because different people with different needs exist, nothing.

                  Y’all are just angry other people are opposing you because you think us chucklefucks online disagreeing with you is a barrier to what you want and I’m tired of putting up with it.

                  So until you change, I’m going to be angry at you, and if you don’t like me being angry at you for your own behavior, that’s a you problem. I don’t need you to listen to me or even like me, but you apparently need my approval for your stupid policies and ill-thought-out ideas, and therefore you need me a whole lot more than I need you. The only one hurt by my anger is you. You’re the one complaining about it.

                  You’re fucking political parasites and I’m tired of it.

                  Now let’s watch your dumb ass prove my point and do nothing but address my anger and my emotions while not addressing the needs of the disabled people who would be thrown under the bus with car bans at all. 🙄

                  • gayhitler420@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Busses here have better accessibility than cars.

                    There are people who need more aid than the busses are equipped for and the bus line runs specially equipped shuttles out to them on request at no cost (back when the busses had fares it cost the same as a bus ride).

                  • TheDankHold@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You accuse others of childish banality yet the only condescending jackass in this discussion is you as you lob insults and talk down to people.

                    News flash, walkable cities and public transit are better for disabled people than cars. Have a person in a wheel chair try to drive a car. Lets a blind person peel out on a motorcycle why don’t you you dipshit? Know how easy it is for a paraplegic to use a subway? They take a ramp or elevator down then roll on and off the cars as they please. Know how a blind person can get around without needing a friend with a car? They can make their way to a bus station where they can be taken across town.

                    Oh and finally, a “car ban”? Who mentioned flatly banning cars you disingenuous idiot? We want to design infrastructure for more than just cars, not ban them.

                    One way to come across as childishly banal and negative is to rant at someone for how bad of a person they are because of your own idiotic assumptions about their position.

                    You’re an insanely unserious person so log off and look into what people are actually advocating for instead of swallowing gallons of bullshit from people that know better. It’s unbecoming of someone with your smug sense of superiority.

      • ShouldIHaveFun@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        How do disabled people who can’t drive get their groceries in a car centric city?

        If you can drive a car, you can probably also drive an electric wheelchair. This should be sufficient to take public transit or go to a nearby store.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          By having specially designed cars that enable them to drive.

          Even the ones who by the nature of their disability can’t do anything mentally or visually taxing, like drive, don’t disprove or negate the need for cars because everyone else with disabilities need them to get around. Public transport simply isn’t suitable enough for them.

          Even old blind people who can’t pass driving tests use Uber or Lyft, because public transport simply isn’t safe or suitable enough for them, especially during grocery runs.

          • ShouldIHaveFun@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Even old blind people who can’t pass driving tests use Uber or Lyft, because public transport simply isn’t safe or suitable enough for them, especially during grocery runs.

            You are assuming a car centric city here. In a walking and transit oriented city, it is safe and suitable for blind people to be independent and move by themselves. Only cars make the cities unsafe and the lack of transit makes it unsuitable to use something else than a car.

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              And I am assuming that because they are the norm you’re complaining about in the first place.

              If they’re not, then go move to one.

              It’s as simple as that. But you don’t get to demand other people lose their cars just because you don’t like them, especially disabled people that will always need them as no walkable city will replace the individual autonomy, carrying capacity and convenience a car provides.

          • SeaJ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            You seem to live in a car centric city with really shitty public transportation. My city has decent regular bus service and for those who need extra help, they have more handy centric busses that will directly pick people up on a schedule. I think even the tiny town I grew up in has a service that does the same because there are tons of older people that are not able to drive. We also have a shuttle service to the train station if you live too far away from one.

            There are solutions to these problems that tons of cities have had no problem implementing. It sounds like either yours is not one of them or possibly it is not a service you need so you just plain do not think about it.

          • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Public transport simply isn’t suitable enough for them.

            Ding dong, you’re wrong. Walkable cities are more accessible for everyone than the carcentric dystopia.

      • SeaJ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Generally there is at least one bus stop or train stop by a grocery store. The amount of walking is roughly the same.