• 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    263
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I actually don’t agree, and the reason is - non tech people. You and me can install plugins but ordinary people don’t do that. So the default experience must be good, offering improvements to the experience over Google Chrome.

    Otherwise all privacy features could also be plugins. Imagine if that was true. Firefox would have no identity and you would have to install plugins and make it your own.

    So some features should be built in. Maybe the ability to get pop-ups about false reviews will actually make users go “wow that is so useful”.

    • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      190
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Compromise: Develop it as a Plugin and then install it by default. That way people who don’t want the feature can easily remove it completely. That approach would likely also reduce the number of Firefox forks whose sole purpose is to remove the new features some consider bloat.

      • tweeks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Good solution, perhaps two simple options at browser install: Default / Custom. That way you don’t have to uninstall all the stuff at the end.

          • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Probably handle it similarly to how Chrome handles an extension asking for new permissions. It disables the add-on and gives the user a small non-intrusive notification on the options menu. Opening the notification notified the user about the change in permissions and asks them if they want to re-enable the add-on or remove it from Chrome.

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Now, let’s talk about adblockers… Oh, wait, Google would get upset if FF had an inbuilt adblocker and could stop giving us those $weet money…

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        If Google stopped sponsoring, Mozilla would go down and Google would get slammed with anti-monopoly lawsuits from the EU.

        So Mozilla can do whatever they want and Google won’t stop sending them money. Since that is a lot more profitable in the long run.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Mozilla can do whatever they want and Google won’t stop sending them money.

          So… What are they waiting for? Are they going to rely on gorhill for ever?

            • jdaxe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Sure, as long as we still have options to disable their blocker and use a 3rd party one if we choose. It’s astounding how many users don’t bother to install an adblocker and it would be a massive improvement for those users who don’t know better.

              There’s been more than one occasion that I’ve used a family member’s PC and they have Firefox installed without a single extension, they didn’t even know that extensions existed.