• iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think quite a few of us use torrents on a remote server, so the thin app / remote client combo mode that deluge/transmission support puts them ahead of any other for consideration.

    • PeachMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Are you taking about remotely accessing the insurance interface from the web interface? Qbittorrent offers that, and honestly I think most of the clients on this list do as well?

      • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope, I mean a remote client. You get a full GUI on your local machine, but that actually is connected to a remote server, where the downloads actually take place. This has the extra responsiveness of an app vs a web UI, and you can also associate magnets/torrents as if it was a local app.

        • PeachMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Kinda neat, though I’m not really convinced that it’s necessary…I don’t think a web UI is unresponsive, and it’s pretty easy to just copy and paste magnet links. Also, if you’re looking for a way to automate things and manage torrents remotely…Radarr/Sonarr and the other 'arrs are the way to go.

          • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not absolutely necessary. But then again, you could use rTorrent and work from console. Not that the WebUI is indispensable either, when your main source is the -Arrs. But still, I still prefer to have a full blown GUI at hand that takes files and links natively, if I have the choice, instead of a more limited WebUI.

        • rambos@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I miss that from transmission, but qbit is more suitable for arrs and that was a dealbreaker for me

          • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            In which way is it more suitable? I’m using Deluge now. It allows labels, so my Sonarr and Radarr torrents have their individual labels and get moved to specific folders accordingly.

            • rambos@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, I was talking about transmission, not deluge. Transmission doesnt support categories afaik. I never tried deluge tbh

              • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s the point…I ended up moving away from Transmission to Deluge back in the day. Deluge has a lot of quirks and its own messiness too, so if you’re happy with Transmission, by all means stick to it.

        • marx2k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean … qbittorrent has that and more in a web interface and is plenty responsive. Why an app of a web interface gets the job done?