The United States is already a global leader in traffic-related fatalities, with a thirty-percent jump in the last decade. That’s in contrast to every other developed country, which saw a decline.

The electric Ford Lightning, for example, is a whopping 6,500 pounds. The Hummer EV is even heavier, clocking in at 9,000 pounds. Its battery alone weighs more than a Honda Civic. Experts have pointed out the significant safety ramifications of this transition for a while, but it’s still not clear that we’ve prepared the regulatory and policy landscape for such a transition.

Even if you don’t want a giant, extremely heavy EV, the tendency to purchase such vehicles creates an arm race for everyone interested in protecting their family on the road. That in turn causes a shift away from smaller EVs in a bid to feed the elemental materials needed for ever larger EV batteries.

“Norway, a pioneer in EV use, is considering a weight-based tax to steer buyers away from the fattest EVs (the Norwegian government recently eliminated EV purchase incentives). France already has one on SUVs. Buyers of new diesel and gasoline vehicles must pay a tax of €10 ($14.58) a kilo (2.2 pounds) above 1.8 tons. The weight threshold is to be reduced. EVs are exempt, but as those vehicles become heavier and more popular, it seems they will get swept into the weight-based tax net.”

A smattering of localities have tried to prepare for the threat. DC, for example, has imposed a creative vehicle registration fee schedule that has heavy EV truck and SUV owners paying higher registration fees than lighter EV sedans. But it’s an outlier.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 months ago

    Interesting what I don’t see in this article. There’s a lot of different drivers for costs of car infrastructure maintenance. But one of the most important drivers is weight. It causes more stress on the road surface and decreases that lifespan.

    I agree with the article, just weird that they left out the most compelling argument for a weight tax on ALL vehicles.

    • huginn@feddit.it
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      They should also raise the gas tax so it’s cheaper to own an EV.

      Make evs expensive, sure, but make gas more expensive.

      • mwguy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Can we instead remove oil subsidies?

          • mwguy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Because it’s easier to sell ending oil subsidies rather than raising gas taxes. Ending corporate subsidies has broad support among Americans.

            • huginn@feddit.it
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I was meaning it as the meme “porque no los dos” but yeah I get it.

    • geosoco@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s definitely true. It’s also a concern for a lot of infrastructure like parking garages and bridges.

      I suspect it’s left out because the site focuses on tech, but I’ve seen a few articles looking at that this year. I think some states already do licenses based on weight, though arguably it’s not enough.

      Apparently, there’s some loopholes that manufacturer’s are using to justify increasing weights (eg. this ), and a similar taxbreak from some recent legislation for cars over 6k lbs.

    • Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You bring the tax in for EVs first, and conservatives will either not care or even cheer for it. A new tax on woke cars!

      Then after the next election you quietly extend it to all vehicles.

    • thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean, there basically is, but it’s usually just factored it into something like gas taxes instead of having a specific line item for it. Since EVs don’t pay that tax, there needs to be a separate one somewhere.

      • paultimate14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        In that US? Gasoline taxes don’t even cover the cost of cleaning up emissions, let alone paving the roads. It’s subsidized by other tax revenue.

  • clearedtoland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ngl, started reading the headline and thought this was going to be a tax on heavy people to combat the threat posed by obesity…

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Even a fully loaded F-450 doesnt match the 9,000 pound behometh that is the electric hummer. And most truck drivers use the F-150(or brand equal), which maxes out at 5757 pounds. (Min is 4070) Still absurdly heavy, but much lighter than the Hummer.

        • Throwaway@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          9 months ago

          8587 isn’t quite 9000 lbs. Close, but no cigar. And the 450 is a ridiculous truck (which I just love tbh), but even in Texas, almost no one drives them. Biggest you usually see are 350s, or at least in my experience. And the 150 is just every where.

          • Tathas@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            A 5% difference is close enough for me. You make it sound like the EV part is where all the weight is coming from when the ICE versions are already there. And please, “The hummer EV is too much but the regular hummer is fine”? The hummer is just already excess no matter what version you’re talking about.

            I see people commuting in F250s to their tech jobs cause they tow stuff once in a while, and they don’t feel safe driving the same size vehicles as 95% of the rest of traffic around them. Then they whine about parking spaces.

  • SitD@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    i love this type of policy. oh you’re rich? 😂👍 go ahead risk as many lives as you want

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This is a good policy, there will be some people that be like “oh you’re rich, drive whatever” but the reality is this affects the automaker’s calculus so those heavy cars will be rebranded as luxury and smaller consumer cars will get more production. This is better for road maintenance, safety, etc.