This one’s super sketch. It’s not even a study, it’s just an article and the particular claim they’re making comes from other research and is more about older contraceptives.

Yeah as the other person suggested i suspect it’s more like “when do these expire?” “does this have mold on it?” “what does this sign say?”

You might get some about “does this match?” but i don’t know

Take this article with a grain of salt.

1. the site that hosts it is a garbage clickbait health site.
2. It links to an article in the NIH database, but it’s from last year and as the bright yellow box says, there are some concerns about the article. ( concern and the reply )
3. It has been corrected
4. They also note in the article “all oral contraceptive pills may cause mood changes, but the newer oral contraceptive pills containing estradiol or estradiol valerate may be less likely to cause mood changes.”

The intent is to ban books about topics they don’t like racism, queers, trans folks, abortion, etc as part of the “war on wokeness”. They pretend that they’re sexually graphic or things kids shouldn’t learn about, but it’s incredibly unlikely schools ever had books beyond a few classics.

Obviously, these are everyday topics so it’s going to ban a lot of neighboring content, probably including the bible. Regardless, because it’s at a state-run institution, it’s unconstitutional.

The kids will hear about all of these topics in much greater detail on fox news every day anyway, so this is entirely for show and to cause chaos.

Great summary! a teensy nitpick. I wouldn’t say the most recent court said it was “fine” per se since they didn’t give any reasoning. It is at least possible, that there is a technical issue with earlier rulings. It could be minor technicality, and they let the law take effect pending the next court date?

I think your implication is likely correct, and this is probably political, but we really don’t know the reason, and I think not giving one is surprising.

It’s funny to watch his facade occasionally fall and the curtain to be peeled back, and yet the show just keeps going.

Unlike other politicians, the trail of grifts with him is long, and yet people still keep him going.

Yeah, that’s my problem. I added it after they commented.

Some highlights if you don’t want to click:

Temperatures are forecast to be warmer than normal for all of the northern U.S., from northern California, Oregon and Washington to Pennsylvania, New York and into New England.

NOAA says that temperatures will stay closer to the 30-year average for the South.

For the precipitation (rain, snow, sleet, etc.), the northern states could see below-normal snowfall, especially in the northern Rockies and the Great Lakes.

Across most of the South, wetter than normal conditions are expected, especially in the Southeast from Louisiana to Florida and into the Carolinas.

For the Northeast, there is a chance that this will be a wetter than normal winter from Washington, D.C., to Philadelphia, to New York City and into southern New England.

super important detail

One other thing to note, this is all a probability forecast. The atmosphere is very fluid and dynamic, and forecasts could change.

OP NOTE: This is actually a week old, today 3 judge panel allowed the ban to go into effect. Here’s the author’s mastodon post about it. though there are few other details and I can’t find a new story about it.

BREAKING: A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit (Elrod, Haynes, Douglas) allows Texas’s book-ban law to go into effect, issuing an administrative stay of the district court ruling enjoining enforcement of the law.
The court gave no reasoning for its order, which is remarkable given that the law has never been allowed to go into effect, so the order — although posed as merely “administrative” — is a ruling, at least temporarily, changing the status of state law.

You should 100% lie when you can. You can give every site a different email address, name, birthday, gender, and location and just note all of that in your password manager.

However, there’s a lot you just can’t control, like other people catching you in their pictures.

Or leave the house 😢

This only sorta works for today and if your friends never share images or videos online. The ever-increasing amount of people taking pictures and filming and posting them online means the day is quickly approaching where you could be identified and tracked through other people’s content, security & surveillance cameras, etc.

If stores start adopting the tracking used at Walmart and the Amazon biometric data, social media will be the last of your worries.

Who says there’s no innovation in tech companies today? lol

Avatar checks out

Absolutely, but this is another “don’t tempt me with a great time” example. Where certain a politican tries to name something they think is awful, but actually sounds like something great.

I have no idea what their business model is, but this would be a great way to collect more data for training various forms of AI. Arguably without harvesting people’s personal data or their creative works.

I also suspect that because it’s an assistive tool, it can probably get a fair bit of grant money.

Boss clearly isn’t online much to see their content.

I’ve worked with Gen-Zers and have never seen this specific issue. Sounds like another example of a boss so removed from workers that their “insights” aren’t based on experiences, but rather on that deadly combo of the tendency of older generations to negatively see generational changes, and that corporate group think where they try to justify not paying their workers their value.

It also sounds like a touch of the corporate group think where they forgot how much their employers had to teach them on the job, and how much they don’t want to continue doing that.

GOP: “We support our troops” [by executing them]

Yes, it’s a press release, but I think this is maybe a an interesting use for some of the AI to augment that of volunteers who help describe and annotate for people who have vision challenges.

Welcome to the future [of shit]!