• Esoteir [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      i support this one just because the idea that the pentagon needed to blow itself up to get rid of evidence or something when they have at least one paper shredder in that building is hilarious

      it’s like some sort of liberal brainworm that the dod can’t normally destroy evidence and instead needed a few bad actors to set up an elaborate rube goldberg machine including disappearing an entire plane just to destroy three pieces of paper

      • MattsAlt [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think the idea that it served any other purpose but to “show the scope of the attack against our freedom” is a stretch for exactly that reason. How can you even be sure every piece of evidence is destroyed