X’s new terms of service insist that tweets are now posts::X is rolling out a new terms of service on September 29th, and one adjustment is a single instance of “retweet” to “repost.” There are other changes regarding data scraping and class action lawsuits.

  • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nothing says marketing genius like throwing away one of the most recognisable brands in the industry and replacing it with “X”

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      When your brand gets to the point where it turns into a verb why on earth would you ever torpedo that?

      It’s like if Google changed their name to “search” and prodded people to say “just search it” instead of “just google it”.

  • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wow, that’s… exceedingly boring.

    Imagine buying some of the most recognized branding in the world and tossing it all away. Couldn’t be me.

    • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      I keep wondering what was the asset that Elon bought that was worth $44B? The brand? No, he flushed that down the toilet. The technology? No, he was crapping all over that from day one. The staff? No, he fired most of them. Twitter had no real estate. What was THE THING he paid $44B for?

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        What was THE THING he paid $44B for?

        The only guess I can make is the private jet tracker, which he Streisanded into a subreddit where it will live forever. Lmao.

        • Iwasondigg@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I guess the user base. But he was also shitting all over that saying it was mostly bots. You could say it was a strategy to bring the price down, but he still paid $44B so that didn’t work.

    • jBlight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is probably too conspiracy theory-ish, but I feel like he made some shady side deal or bet that he could destroy the company in record time. You know, bored rich people stuff. I personally can’t fathom how someone can be THAT incompetent and still run so many successful companies. He televises himself as a fool in the public scene, but we don’t know him personally, so we really can’t know. Maybe it’s all for show to highly underestimate him so he can swoop in at pivotal moments… Or he is genuinely a loser rich kid. Haha

  • Chud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    Here’s a low stakes conspiracy. Musk went all in on the “Birds aren’t real” thing, and is now trying to erase birds from the internet.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m still convinced, this all came out because he was butt-hurt about plane tracking and other things, also a convenient dump for Tesla stocks people keep thinking he cares about twitter like the users do, for him, it’s prob just Tuesday

    • Cabrio@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      I like the idea that people at Space X and Tesla dropped Twitter in the corpo baby’s lap so that he’d be distracted from the nice toys.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Also a lot of left-leaning discourse happened there, from American liberals to actual-left communists. The Arab Spring had a lot of coordination happen there (hence the Saudi’s involvement) and the power-hungry capital owners of the world were probably getting tired of being called out. So Elon took one for the team, probably thinking best case he could get bailed out, worst case he could destroy the “public square” that hated on him so much.

      Now the site is just garbage on top of garbage and everyone is looking elsewhere. If he was gonna be forced to buy it, he sure wasn’t just gonna let the above slide…

      • gerryflap@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’ve been thinking this as well. I mean, at this point I don’t see any reason why else he could’ve reasonably done this. Either he’s making no sense, or it’s something like this. Twitter stood for many things he’s against, and he has just completely ruined it

      • ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Hated on him”?

        There was definitely a contingent that did that, but for the most part, Musk had been pretty much invulnerable to criticism, with thousands of fanbois ready to jump to his defence. He’s brought pretty much all of this on himself since he took it over, he’s hurt his own brand way more than Xitter’s.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 months ago

    Enjoy the show, this pyre is fucking massive. Literally turned a brand that became engrained into culture and destroyed it in record time.

  • alienanimals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Literally every single day we have idiots doing Musk’s PR work for free.

    Downvote Musk spam. The billionaire doesn’t need your help ensuring his businesses stay in the 24 hour news cycle.

    • PlexSheep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t care, I just like to watch the fire. If watching the fire makes it burn harder, wouldn’t that be fun?

      • beneeney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        People like to act all holier than thou with this kinda stuff. Whether or not we read and upvote articles about this evil clown isn’t going to change whatever the outcome is. I’d like to see Musk in prison as much as the next guy, but watching him burn twitter down is entertaining as well

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    X has now become just like any other social media platform. Posts are just called “posts” just like anywhere else.

    Looks like Elon Musk has become the Elongated Muskrat once again.

  • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    So if they have publicly abandoned the Twitter brand identity, can someone else use it?

    Because a lot of people are ready for a retro clone.

    • Ado@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      Would be pretty hilarious for something to take the name. But it’s doubtful that they release the name. Twitter.com still directs to x.com

    • J12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Start calling everything posted online a tweet and eventually it’ll become a generic trademark.

    • eric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe I missed the joke, but Twitter no longer has stocks since Elon took it private.