• watson387@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t think this is a good idea. Fascist media will be selectively editing the footage to tell lies about what’s really going on, and we all know the people that watch/listen to that garbage are not concerned with actual facts.

    • galaxies_collide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The media already does that, so it’s really no different. Without live streaming, the media would just straight up lie about what happened in court and live streaming provides vital protection against that. Trump WILL lie about what happens in court, this is why they are live streaming it.

      • watson387@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        True. It’s pretty fucked up that this is even something to be worried about. Trump and his cronies are dogshit.

    • Auzy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trump’s lawyers will definitely be telling lies and spindoctoring everything anyway.

      The difference is, by making it public, it will be very easy to rebuke it

      It’s actually a good thing imho

      • terrrmus@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So far they have all had the luxury of having their cases behind closed doors. There’s so many times where a judge has laid into them for trying to push ridiculous shit. If that happens (which we know it will because they are clowns) it would be great for the public to see the look on their faces.

    • eratic@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disinformation will be spread regardless. Yes, if there’s footage it does mean it can be edited and spliced. But then it’s even easier to clearly show that it’s disinformation if people can just watch the footage.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Precisely this. Whether they have public video of the trial or not, Republicans are going to make up a fantasy version of it anyway. Might as well have this major piece of history on public record as it happens.

    • Big P@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s never a good idea to live stream court cases. It interferes with actual justice and makes it a show instead

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh great. I’ll get live updates from the Heritage Foundation and the Daily Signal about how Biden’s anarchistic will is being carried out through Fani Willis in an egregious abuse of the law to prosecute the greatest political force for good the world has ever seen since Chile’s Pinochet.

    I can’t wait!

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A small internet community magically doing as you wish and ignoring him is roughly as effective in changing the outcome as a video game boycott.

      spoiler

      Both are ineffective.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I not talking about boycotts. I’m talking about giving him attention and publicity that he wouldn’t otherwise get. Like live streaming his trial, for example.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This little community, even with federated size, will not change the outcome whether or not we pay attention to this.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              They didn’t clarify that way or respond accordingly, so I really don’t know.

              EDIT:

              Like live streaming his trial

              Fine, there it is. I do agree that it’s going to likely boost Trump’s re-election chances and that sucks.

              • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They said they weren’t talking about boycotts - as in they are not shaming us for participating in the discussion of this.

                They then say

                Im talking about giving him attention and publicity that he wouldn’t otherwise get. Like live streaming his trial, for example.

                As in that the live streaming of his trial is a bad thing.
                They talked about the trial the whole time, you two just misunderstood each other, it’s what happens.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is exactly the kind of circus the ultimate fascist clown wants.

    That’s fine, I’ll still eat that garbage! feast

    EDIT DISCLAIMER: I really wish this publicity stunt wouldn’t happen at all because it’s likely to get the fascist clown re-elected, but if it’s going to happen, I may as well peek in on it here and there or at least read about it. doomer

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me: . o O (Why would anyone claim that truth makes the world worse? Oh! It’s someone from Hexbear trying to make the world as shitty as possible. How utterly expected.)

      • Vlhacs@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        As if conservative “news” media is actually going to show any part of the trial that can actually convince their viewers that he’s guilty.

        • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least it will be free so anyone interested can watch it directly and not get someone else’s biased interpretation

          Some people will naturally only want the lazy option, but I think a large number of people from across the political spectrum will watch at least some parts of the trial

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lmao when was the last time the american public watched a presidential debate on its own. There’s a reason you have such a large amount of infotainment that cuts those things down to cute soundbites.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Donald Trump’s trial in Georgia over charges of election fraud will be livestreamed and televised, a judge has ruled.

    All the hearings will be available live on Fulton County Court’s YouTube channel, said Judge Scott McAfee.

    Mr Trump and 18 people are charged with a conspiracy to overturn the state’s 2020 presidential election results.

    Mr Trump briefly travelled to Atlanta last week to turn himself in at Fulton County Jail and have his mugshot taken.

    Prosecutors allege that he pressured Georgia officials to reverse the results of the election in the state, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

    The former New York real estate tycoon is the current frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination and his mounting legal problems have done nothing to dent his popularity among his supporters.


    The original article contains 449 words, the summary contains 131 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!