For the next three years, Google must meet the following criteria:

  • Allow third-party app stores for Android, and let those app stores distribute all the same apps as are available in Google Play (app developers can opt out of this);
  • Distribute third-party app stores as apps, so users can switch app stores by downloading a new one from Google Play, in just the same way as they’d install any app;
  • Allow apps to use any payment processor, not just Google’s 30 percent money-printing machine;
  • Permit app vendors to tell users about other ways to pay for the things they buy in-app;
  • Permit app vendors to set their own prices.

Google is also prohibited from using its cash to fence out rivals, for example, by:

  • Offering incentives to app vendors to launch first on Google Play, or to be exclusive to Google Play;
  • Offering incentives to app vendors to avoid rival app stores;
  • Offering incentives to hardware makers to pre-install Google Play;
  • Offering incentives to hardware makers not to install rival app stores.
  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    146
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ok now do Apple.

    Google has always been the OS that allows users to get their apps anywhere. Apple has not.

    Also could we throw in something that allows me to remove all Google apps from a stock OS instead of just disabling?

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      iOS is certainly far more locked down than Android.

      But thats not really what courts are looking at with the Google stuff going on recently.

      The courts take issue with Google strong-arming OEMs to do what Google says. Forcing them to include Google services, Google tracking, not to have other stores as default, etc. under threat of not allowing Google Apps, Play Store, or Play Services/notifications to work - something that is effectively a requirement if you want to sell your devices.

      Apple isn’t doing that. Apple isn’t forcing OEMs to push Apple services and telemetry, because they own their own hardware business. Apple isn’t forcing Samsung/OnePlus/Sony/etc to do their bidding. Google is.

      I firmly believe Apple should be made to open up their devices, but it cannot be done under current US law (unlike with Google, who is unquestionably abusing their dominant market position by strong-arming OEMs). Forcing Apple to open up would require something like a US equivalent to the EU’s recent Digital Markets Act.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        IIRC they are doing things like requiring payments to go through them, and all kinds of other monopolistic stuff. Yeah, they aren’t doing all the same things, but they’re doing a lot of it, and it’s more restricted by default so it’s even more pervasive.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Ah, OK. I don’t think I ever heard about that resolving, or if I did I didn’t care. That’s good that they were forced to allow that. It should probably go further still, like this Google case.

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              The point is, it can’t go further like in this Google case, because Google is abusing their dominant market position and Apple isn’t.

              Google is doing something illegal. Apple is doing something legal, but anti-consumer.

              That’s why I said in order to go after Apple, the US would first need something akin to the EU’s Digital Markets Act.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                It could absolutely be argued Apple is definitely doing illegal stuff too. Just because you don’t think so doesn’t mean that’s true. Apple is doing a lot of things to lock consumers onto their platform and not allowing competition.

                • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 minutes ago

                  Not me. Me and the courts. Against what you think.

                  They’ve literally been to court over this and won, because what they’re doing is completely legal. Even Epic acknowledged their case was shaky in regards to Apple.

                  Apple is doing a lot of things to lock consumers onto their platform and not allowing competition.

                  Nothing in an illegal way, they mostly just make it a slight inconvenience to leave. Again, not illegal. Which is why I advocated making it so.

                  Why don’t you want laws that will hold Apple and others more accountable?

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The way Apple gets away with stuff makes me feel very conspiratorial. Like, how?

      How is Apple getting a pass every time and my tin foil hat would say that they are protected by the US government. Maybe because it’s just an important corporation for the US economy but maybe it’s an important corporation for US spying too.

      • Benign@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        US law doesn’t care what companies do to consumers. The law only cares what they do to other companies. Apple own their own hardware production and ecosystem, so they aren’t harming other companies (directly).

        No conspiracy needed.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Apple absolutely harms other companies to the point where are taken to court all the time.

          There’s no such thing as “their own ecosystem”

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, but those companies are poorer, and have lower tier legal teams.

            Das capitalism baby!