• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    You joke, but we actually do need desalination plants — starting yesterday. Water will be the new oil soon.

    • exohuman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, we definitely do. We are already seeing the result of not thinking ahead in the southwest. I’m not really joking about the plants. We need nuclear plants to provide the clean energy to desalinate on the levels we need to sustain agriculture and cities without contributing to global warming.

      • Edmond Dantesk@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        … or maybe switch to a less water intensive form of agriculture ?

        Edit : I mean, how sustaining a wasteful practice with a huge wasteful infrastructure is progress ?

          • Edmond Dantesk@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe we should, but I’m not sure we can - because one (nuclear + desalination) acts as a disincentive to the other (actually chaning practice).

            Also, building a nuclear reactor takes a lot of time (do we have it ?), changing agricultural practices can start right now and scale progressively.