• @riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10110 months ago

    The biggest media corporations are allowed to advertise literal crime. Meanwhile saying the word cigarette on tv will get you jail time.

    • @Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      That wock is absolutely fent, and with those prices, that LSD is probably 25i.

      The DMT seems legit tho

  • Remmock
    link
    fedilink
    4110 months ago

    ITT: People who are so quick to suggest ad blockers they miss the point of the conversation.

    • Nightwatch Admin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Well, Instagram did just that for my little book publishing company. I signed up for a business account in the hopes of selling some books, putting up some ads, and posting a few updates, only to get a fucking PERMABAN during fucking SIGNUP.

      So you are right and it really is super easy.

          • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            But conceivably they could be enforcing the law by putting pressure on these companies to stop facilitating advertising of illegal services and thereby the flow of business. If they instead just don’t bother with that so that they can use these ads to pick out and track down the juiciest, lowest effort prosecution targets, representing a small proportion of the total market, that’s pure corruption with little to no social benefit.

            To be clear I don’t actually know if this is what is going on, but if it was it would be reprehensible.

  • @NAS89@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3310 months ago

    Similarly, my YouTube shorts are filled with gambling videos and “get rich quick scheme” videos. Seems as though “do not recommend channel” blocks the channel but assumes you have some growing interest in the topic.

    I just want to watch woodworking shorts and plumbing videos T_T

    • @boringbisexual@lib.lgbt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      I just got an extension that removes shorts. I tried blocking channels, saying I wasn’t interested, pressing the thumbs down button, but it would still show trash like Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate.

    • 10EXP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Maybe do Not Interested and then Do not recommend channel?

      Unless doing the former just hides the video immediately and doesn’t let you do the latter, in which case just call me a fool.

    • EnderWi99in
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yeah I just get fed with bullshit on ADHD and Autism nonstop.

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2310 months ago

    Now here’s the exact problem with the so called “personalized” ads, that Google and Facebook serves what the advertisers think you want to see, instead of what you actually want to see.

    This is the fundamental conflict of interest which the obvious conclusion is that online banner/video advertisements doesn’t work, and has never worked, because ultimately, no matter how many times you shove ads in people’s faces via a thoughtless machine, you can’t “trick” people into liking something. What people want is thoughtful, sincere recommendations by real people, which is why we have seen the rise of sassy brand Twitter accounts being so successful for a time: because there is a real person behind it.

    (Of course, it’s really funny if you take blatant advertisment to its logical extreme, and even that seemed more effective.)

    Of course, Google and Facebook will never admit that they’ve been lying to everyone and themselves for more than a decade, because to do so is to admit that their entire business of Web 2.0 was built on an absurd and illogical premise of again, if you show people ads for things they never asked for a thousand times, then you can brainwash them into liking something.

    In other words, Google and Facebook’s entire advertisment business model, if you really think about it, is really no different than pick-up artist logic, and. They. Just. Won’t. Go. Away.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1310 months ago

      Turns out though you can absolutely trick them into believing conspiracy theories with social media ads.

      • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        Learn the TRUTH about this thing you’re already primed for by your bias!

        click

        Holy crap! He’s a alien! U cud tell frum the eyez! 👁️👁️👀👽

    • @DryTomatoes4@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      Pretty much every industry works by tricking people into liking things.

      Like the razors with four+ blades on them, people buy them cause the commercials say “more blades is better”.

      People wouldn’t seek out extra blades if they weren’t tricked into liking it. They are objectively worse than single blade razors.

      • @Rev3rze@lemdit.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Exactly. If it didn’t pay off these companies wouldn’t keep shoveling money to Facebook and Google to show their ads time and time again. Marketing is expensive. If it didn’t at least break even then nobody would be doing it anymore by now. Obviously it works, otherwise I wouldn’t ever know what the fuck a squarespace or a goddamn raid shadow legends is.

    • @Halosheep@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      The ads that I mind the least and the ones I find the most effective are sponsors for creators that I like. Short sponsor segments really don’t annoy me as much and I have actually tried a couple products that have advertised that way.

      That said, almost all of them sucked in the end but that’s another subject entirely.

    • @theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      I may or may not have acquired exactly the acid in those pics.

      I definitely did not.

      Or did I?

      It looks identical actually and I’m willing to bet it came from the same place.

      If I actually had it that is.

  • @Astroturfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2010 months ago

    Drugs or Chinese scam products. Had a friend tell me he ordered something that never showed up, turned out they sent these super cheap toothbrushes in the mail and then tried to use that tracking info as proof he received what he bought. They just allow anyone who will pay to advertise illegal shit, scams, whatever it’s the wild West.

  • @RobotToaster
    link
    English
    1710 months ago

    Aren’t those ads personalised to your browsing history?

    • Bonehead
      link
      fedilink
      1710 months ago

      Tangently…you read one gay rights article and suddenly your ad feed is filled with hot single dads in my area…

    • deadcream
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      They are personalised by the “bucket” that data collection companies like Google or Facebook placed you into based on profiling. Browsing and search history is only one of the factors that is taken into account when you are profiled, there are myriad more ways to collect data about you.
      And then what ads you see is determined by what advertisers think your “bucket” wants. If you are male in your 20s living in rural USA and advertisers think that males in their 20s living in rural USA are interested in guns, then that’s what you will see - even if you never clicked on gun ad or searched for guns on Google.

    • @Iusedtobeanadventurer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      Personally whenever I go to Instagram all I get are cat videos and ads about “targeted mushrooms” and kava drinks…

      It all checks out ¯_(ツ)_/¯