• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The danger here is that they make “open” standards so horrendously complex and ever evolving that only the billionaire mega corporations can can realistically keep up with them.

    See the web where Google now control it completely by having such an enormous amount of code that even Microsoft couldn’t be arsed to keep up, or Office Open XML, where 100% compatibility is limited to exactly one product: The one that made it. I just downloaded the documentation for the standard. It is over 5000 fucking pages long. That was part 1 of 4.

    • Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think that this is the reason that the rust programming language exists: to make learning the skill too hard for a regular person.

      • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        32 minutes ago

        My favorate quote about the language is, “it feels like rust was made by people who hate uncertan behavor.” Languages with manual memory management are harder. On top of that, Rust demands you prove your memory management is ‘correct’.