Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agoCalifornia governor vetoes bill requiring speeding alerts in new carsapnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down18cross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1147arrow-down1external-linkCalifornia governor vetoes bill requiring speeding alerts in new carsapnews.comCephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square34fedilinkcross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down1·17 hours agoSounds like NHTSA recommended the veto so we don’t end up with competing standards. Good move, IMO. For a system as large as this, with severe safety implications, you really don’t want to start on the wrong foot.
minus-squareJustin@lemmy.jlh.namelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·edit-214 hours agoThe article doesn’t say that the NHTSA asked Newsom to veto, just that they were working on a similar regulation. It sounded like the car companies just wanted him to veto it so they could keep reckless drivers as a customer base. The proposed regulation only kicks in at 10 mph over the speed limit (ie reckless driving and deadly to pedestrians)
minus-squarebrygphilomena@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·11 hours agoIt’s weird to see 10mph considered reckless driving. In California, 10mph over is the slow lane.
minus-squareJustin@lemmy.jlh.namelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·3 hours agoIf you hit a pedestrian going 35 on a 25 mph neighborhood street, the majority of the time, that pedestrian will die. Probably closer to like 70% if you’re driving a truck. Going 10 over in pedestrian areas kills people. https://aaafoundation.org/impact-speed-pedestrians-risk-severe-injury-death/ To be fair, going 10 over on a highway isn’t as reckless.
minus-squareCephalotrocity@biglemmowski.winOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·17 hours ago you really don’t want to start on the wrong foot. We all be walkin’ here. GET OUT (I kid)
minus-squarekibiz0r@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·17 hours agoIt’s a car’s world, we’re just walkin in it.
Sounds like NHTSA recommended the veto so we don’t end up with competing standards.
Good move, IMO. For a system as large as this, with severe safety implications, you really don’t want to start on the wrong foot.
The article doesn’t say that the NHTSA asked Newsom to veto, just that they were working on a similar regulation.
It sounded like the car companies just wanted him to veto it so they could keep reckless drivers as a customer base.
The proposed regulation only kicks in at 10 mph over the speed limit (ie reckless driving and deadly to pedestrians)
It’s weird to see 10mph considered reckless driving.
In California, 10mph over is the slow lane.
If you hit a pedestrian going 35 on a 25 mph neighborhood street, the majority of the time, that pedestrian will die. Probably closer to like 70% if you’re driving a truck. Going 10 over in pedestrian areas kills people.
https://aaafoundation.org/impact-speed-pedestrians-risk-severe-injury-death/
To be fair, going 10 over on a highway isn’t as reckless.
We all be walkin’ here. GET OUT (I kid)
It’s a car’s world, we’re just walkin in it.