Description: A picture titled “Russian plants” in a 3 x 3 grid with one of the grid items being Jill Stein, the rest are flora.

    • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Stien is the nominee for one of the worthless 3rd parties we have here. The only people who vote for her are narcissists who call trump Hitler but are okay with letting him win by throwing away their votes so they can pretend to be extra liberal. In some ways they are just as bad as trump supporters.

      • niktemadur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Divide-and-conquer just enough to let bush win, then trump.
        It’s because of these bOtH pArTiEs ArE tHe SaMe LoL mY pUriTeH assholes that we got the Iraq invasion, the Kyoto Protocol global warming agreement being ignored and discarded, the indifferent federal response to the Katrina disaster in New Orleans, children in cages separated from their immigrant parents, the sluggish response to Covid, etc.

        The world an objectively worse place via republican excrement policies, none of which would have happened if these narcissistic assholes weren’t enamored of the stench of their own mUh PuRiTeH! flatulences to see a clear and present danger in front of our noses.

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        In a way they’re worse. At least MAGAs are open about being shitty people and don’t pretend otherwise. Stein supporters will act smug and superior (“I didn’t vote for Trump directly, so my hands are totally clean!”) while they let Trump fuck everyone (Gaza included) over. They’re so focused on what’s happening across the ocean that they don’t care about the dumpster fire happening at home unless they can use it as ammunition to push “BoTh SiDeS” bullshit.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It sucks that common mugwort is still illegal here in Indiana. Thankfully, there’s a dispensary about 30 minutes away in Illinois.

  • Stoneykins [any]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    No one person, thing, or organization I regularly interact with has tried as hard as lemmy.world to convince me she is some kinda fucked up spoiler effect politics demon.

    Maybe dems should actually try to make ranked choice voting happen for real, instead of lip service to the idea, if they want the people who prefer third parties to support them. And maybe dems should attempt to do anything at all to address the concerns of the third party voters, instead of just threatening them with trump some more. Just some ideas that might alleviate the problem more effectively than getting really mad at people on the internet.

    • Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      “And maybe they should do it RIGHT NOW, and maybe I’ll vote then but it’ll still be for not Dems, and maybe they should also stop genocide, and maybe maybe maybe. …”

      Did I capture your full wishlist there? Anything else you’d like now without regard for how long it takes?

      • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Let’s be real here, Harris could bend over backwards and support every single one of their positions and they still would find an excuse not to vote for her. It’s not about actually achieving anything. If they actually cared about Palestinians then they’d work with the one viable candidate who could work towards a ceasefire (and Harris has openly said she wants a ceasefire and two-state solution, don’t give me that “both sides” bullshit. You know Trump is worse) instead of throwing away their vote and pushing nothingburger parties that can’t achieve anything in the current system and siphon votes away from the only viable party who could achieve a ceasefire.

        If they really cared about moving the country forward, they’d be working from within to push the Dems leftwards so that they might get what they want. Change doesn’t happen in a day, and it certainly won’t happen through third parties. In a FPTP system, change must happen from within.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Did I capture your full wishlist there?

        No. Not even close.

        But yes having a liberated and democratic society that doesn’t support genocide is pretty high on the list.

    • anarcho_blinkenist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      It’s very weird having scrolled in my feed toward the world stuff. It almost seems artificial, like the redditors all collected here with all the hivemind weirdness and astroturfing.

      and yeah, Democrats would rather send their dark-money and ‘venture-capitalist’-funded PAC lawyers to purge 3rd parties from ballots (really democratic, Democrat party; I’m writing in PSL regardless if they can’t get back on and telling everyone I know to) than make themselves appealing at all to the people abandoning their moribund and redundant party ‘like rats from a sinking ship’.

      They would rather fight with the Republicans over the (shrinking) voter base of rich and upper ‘middle class’ petty bourgeois rightwingers, and alienate all of their leftwing base, and continue abandoning the 35-50% that straight up don’t vote for either of these duopoly-of-exploiters in this fascist-and-vampire show, than reorient toward positions of “not genocide” or “not nuclear-brinksmanship forever-war proxy-wars” or “not-constantly bipartisanly increasing and expanding the US military and neo-colonial racketeer system which is incidentally one of the leading contributors to climate change.”

      or “not continuing filling the world with CIA torture camps” or "not being just as or in some ways more right wing than trump on immigration somehow

      It’s telling that they refuse to do any of these things a large portion of the population wants; to the point where Muslim groups are advocating voting for 3rd parties who aren’t for drinking the blood of Palestinians (apparently a tall order for US politicians), and instead would rather put so much effort into demonizing and crushing 3rd parties who do advocate against these things.

      I don’t even know if they’re capable of not flying to the right and pandering to right wingers more and more due to their donor base. Their structure is inherently based on funding and campaigning and working for the worst billionaire imperialists and arms-dealer death-merchants in the world and AIPAC and tech monopolies etc. If we all pushed up the PSL to hold their working class margins hostage that they (unlike republicans) actually rely on and take for granted, they might break in half trying to reorient. Maybe they’d float a reformist party to prevent everyone going socialist against the open-fanged republicans who nobody ever had any illusions about and half the dems who are basically republicans will join them, and the other half will flee to the new reformist party (probably alienating their “left wing” into more radical politics because that party would become democrat-ified)

      People just want to be lied to about the Democrats that they’re different and ‘acting resistance’ at all to the republicans, when they’re really not that different — and where they (barely) are different, they just capitulate and help the Republicans do whatever they were going to do, in the name of “bipartisanship” and “reaching across the aisle”. Like when Obama had both houses of congress and refused to enshrine women’s bodily autonomy and LGBTQ civil rights into law. And then gave away a free Supreme Court seat in capitulation. Then Biden denounces the idea of pushing to expand and pack the court because it’ll “politicize the court” as if that ship isn’t gone past the horizon forever, while doing nothing as women’s and LGBTQ rights are torn down throughout the country, even with a Democrat president. It’s almost like they don’t actually care, or even like when women’s rights and LGBTQ rights are under attack because they can drum up fear about the republicans and look ‘better’ by comparison after creating the problem in the first place, and keep the vampire-and-fascist (dog-and-pony) show going, and get all the gullible liberal votes that “they’ll vote for us anyway — we’re not the republicans” Which circles back to why they’re so scared of and pushing demonization and repression of 3rd parties I guess. That’s a pretty sweet cruise-control-deal they have hoodwinking the populace in a sort of face/heel drama for their ‘audience’

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        People just want to be lied to about the Democrats that they’re different and ‘acting resistance’ at all to the republicans, when they’re really not that different

        There is a fundamental difference between Liberal Democrats and Conservative Republicans with regard to domestic policy and social issues. That’s why you’ve got folks like Obama and Hilary and Biden bending on gay marriage, throwing kickbacks to the domestic EV market, playing ref between Big Business and Unions, and occasionally kicking some money back for student debt relief. This, while Republicans seem to prefer anti-Trans witch hunts, bailouts to failing coal companies, a court packed full of Pinkertons, and full privatization of the education sector.

        I’m sympathetic to folks who see the choice between Trump and Harris as a question of whether we’re going to do full scale Final Solution shit to the LGBTQ community, because looking at Florida and Texas you can see legitimacy to that fear.

        But when it comes to foreign policy? The MIC has both parties by the balls. This “Trump will be worse on Gaza” is pure cope. This is a campaign of extermination that Biden has actively facilitated. There’s nothing left for Trump to do. Similarly, with Ukraine, the fear is that Trump’s going to step in and deprive Zelensky of our latest arms shipment. He won’t. Trump loves his arms deals almost as much as he loves his trade deals.

        It’s almost like they don’t actually care, or even like when women’s rights and LGBTQ rights are under attack because they can drum up fear about the republicans and look ‘better’ by comparison after creating the problem in the first place

        Domestically, liberals are perfectly happy to push Women’s Rights and LGBTQ Rights amendments at the state level. The biggest hurdle for Dem state reforms have been shitty governors like Hochul and Newsome. When you have a Beshear at the helm, he’s happy to rubber stamp progressive reforms even from a state as red as Kentucky.

        Nationally, Biden fucking sucks. Harris sucks. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying to you. But Dems do have people on their roster that don’t suck. Dem populism does still exist, particularly in the smaller states.

        But the Dems are trending towards a very scary nationalist reflection of the GOP. The Eric Adams style candidate is a fucking sociopath and they’re as common to the party as any milquetoast Beto or SucDem AOC. The quality progressives - your Jamal Bowmans and Cori Bushs - are being drummed out of the party by big money. The Silicon Valley hucksters - your Gilibrands and Newsoms - are continuing to climb the ladder.

        Its fucking crazy when you’ve got Dems clapping like seals over the Dick Cheney endorsement. Grim tidings for the future of the party.

        • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Most dems are not clapping like seals from Cheney’s endorsement. Most of us want him to fuck off. But we can also look to instances like that of how far the Republican Party has fallen when a literal war criminal is like “this is too much even for me”.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            we can also look to instances like that of how far the Republican Party has fallen

            The Cheneys have fallen. The GOP is doing the exact same shit its been on since the Eisenhower Administration. This revanchist “I remember when Republicans were kinda good aktuly” is playing right into Trump MAGA rhetoric.

            • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              No, they are far more extreme than they were before. I literally called Cheney a war criminal. They have never been good, but it’s absolutely true that they are worse than before (republicans). You seem to think in very binary terms which helps makes sense of your simplistic world views.

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                58 minutes ago

                No, they are far more extreme than they were before.

                The extremist rhetoric you’re hearing today was echoed during the Bush Unitary Executive era and was arguably even worse during the Reagan and Nixon eras, when the then-President was significantly more popular.

                it’s absolutely true that they are worse than before (republicans).

                They’re less popular than before, so the fascist policies Americans used to nod and smile at during the War on Drugs or the War on Terror are no longer going down so smoothly. And we’ve had nearly half a century of ramp up. So police brutality was more remarkable during Rodney King, when a few city cops could bludgeon a guy on camera, than in the modern day when the NYPD can merc a guy and two other civilians in the subway over bus fare.

                But the policies? The rhetoric? The machismo attitude? The bigotries? Its the same shit. In many cases, its the same people. John Bolton was literally a Reagan guy who had served in every GOP administration up to Trump. Elliott Abrams was directly implicated in Iran-Contra. Rumsfeld and Cheney were cronies under Gerald Ford, ffs. They were doing all the same bloody-fisted international brutality and signing off on all the domestic immigrant hunting and domestic fear-mongering that we’ve seen under Trump.

                Trump’s judicial appoints are the same Federalist Society hacks that crawled up through the bowls of the prior administrations. His cabinet is stacked with Reagan and Bush Era state level officials. Pence was a Reagan Republican and a Rush-style reactionary talk radio host who worked at the same “Alliance Defending Freedom” right-wing legal lawsuit mills as House Speaker Mike Johnson and SCOTUS judge Amy Comey Barret and Trump AGs William Barr and Jeff Sessions and Missouri Senator Josh Hawley. A 31 year old institution founded by James Dobson, an arch-conservative Christian Fundamentalist.

                This is who they have always been.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It almost seems artificial, like the redditors all collected here with all the hivemind weirdness and astroturfing.

        Because, of course, that’s exactly what did happen. Lemmy isn’t quite as bad as reddit (yet), but they’re working hard to make it that way.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I support genocide fuck the Seventh Day Adventist, strip them of their religion and scatter em to the winds!

      Thats how ya support genocide ya fucken dipshit, recognizing one cant really do anything is not. The problem with Israel is that to cut em off would require an act of Congress not just the president. And lets be honest that aint fucken happenen’.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They’re terrified, because the election is close and a reliable liberal voting block - Arab Americans - is increasingly disenchanted with a liberal leadership that’s pandering to fascists.

      If too many Deerborn, Michigan residents defect from the Harris ticket, liberals are going to be foisted with another four years of Trump. And then the Arab-Americans will be to blame, of course. Not the AIPAC lobbyists or the MIC merchants of death or the O&G land-thieves or the domestic white nationalists. Its those stupid Arabs and their pro-Russian Jill Stein agenda.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I still remember back in January? February? Libs were telling me that Gaza wouldn’t be a factor in this election, because nobody really cared.

      • meliaesc@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        This isn’t still true? What percentage of people genuinely plan to vote Green this election? Lemmy is the only place I’ve seen Jill Stein mentioned, at all.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      They will 100% compromise on war crimes. It’ll just be for Ukraine Russia rather than Israel. Edit: make sure I’m clear on who I’m talking about.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            According to Jill she was there to…

            deliver the—one of the main messages of my campaign, which is that war has failed in the Middle East and that we need a peace offensive consisting of a weapons embargo and a freeze on the funding, the bank accounts of those countries that are sponsoring terrorism. At the time, Russia had just begun to bomb Syria. And my message was that Russia was following in the disastrous footsteps of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.

            So ironically she was actually there talking about a very similar subject in a way to this exact post, war in the middle east. Good to see she hasn’t changed her policy, I guess.

            https://www.democracynow.org/2017/8/1/jill_stein_on_trump_as_a

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Can I get a dinner with Putin where I tell him he shouldn’t do bad things in the Middle East? Because as far as world leaders are concerned, Jill Stein is only slightly more important than you or me, unless Putin has a much more specific reason.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I bet if you were the Green Party’s (or even the Libertarian’s) nominee for the 2016 presidential race you could, in 2015, yes.

                Probably not now but things have changed a little since then if you haven’t noticed lol.

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Dude, that statement above is brazenly self-serving. She wasn’t there to do anything about the Middle East. You only get dinner invites with Putin if he expects to get something from you. Doubly so when Michael Flynn is sitting right next to him.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    16 hours ago

    What’s with the focus on Jill Stein? Third parties aren’t relevant and the number of people who vote for them is far overshadowed by the number of people who don’t vote at all. There are better uses of time than this lame two minutes hate session.

    • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because this is the time of year that Stein starts pushing herself as a candidate after doing nothing for 4 years, and this is an incredibly close presidential race where voting third party is dangerous. Stein herself is also extremely questionable as a candidate so of course people are going to talk about it. There is a vocal minority of Lemmings who are pushing Stein and other third parties very hard, so I can completely understand why others are pushing back with threads like this one.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What’s with the focus on Jill Stein?

      She’s a release valve for the Arab-American protest vote. Arab-Americans are concentrated in the Midwest. Kamala desperately needs the Midwest wall to hold in order to win the White House.

      “Jill Stein is a Russian Plant” is going to become “Arab Americans stabbed America in the back” in a few months, particularly if Harris loses. We’re just seeing the prelude to the anti-Muslim hysteria boiling up in the Democratic Party.

    • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Since Democrats are so corrupt they refuse to abolish the antidemocratic electoral college and have already lost two elections they had the majority of votes in.

      Harris, while popular, is in a dead heat in several swing states with Trump and it’s very likely she’ll lose. Liberals think that having third party candidates takes away votes from Harris even through all evidence points to the contrary.

      • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Since Democrats Republicans are so corrupt they refuse to abolish the antidemocratic electoral college and have already ~~lost~won two elections they had the majorityminority of votes in.

        FTFY.

    • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Russian shills + USA republicans began pushing propaganda for her in a big way after they couldn’t find a decent angle to effectively attack Harris like they did with Biden. Leave that propaganda unchecked and she will divert more than a few votes because propaganda works, so fortunately there is a lot of pushback in the other way.

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Democrats don’t have a comprehensive worldview that can explain why they are so widely disliked and why so many people are apathetic/actively hostile towards America. Russiagate fills the gap in their understanding of the world by imagining that Vladimir Putin is a Great Man of History and that his perfidious scheming is responsible for all of the ills of America’s democratic system.

  • egrets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Can’t speak for many of the rest, but jade plants are from southern Africa. I demand geophylogenetically accurate memes.

    • pftbest@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Jade plants were very popular as house plant in the soviet union, everyone had one at home. This could be a reason why AI got confused there

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That’s an interesting question. I can’t even imagine it was hunger as even kgs of green leaves won’t satiate a family’s hunger. Maybe it was an attempt at checking if the plant could cure when cooked? Maybe it was believed that all stinging and poisonous plants had magical properties? Who knows.

    • Thelsim@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I hate stinging nettles so much… They’re always the first to pop up in spring and ruin an otherwise nice walk in the forest.

    • JaymesRS@literature.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      You can tell they aren’t serious by the lack of local political effort they put in.

      (This post was accidentally edited in an attempt to reply to someone else, this is an in-exact re-creation of what the comment said)

        • JaymesRS@literature.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Posting a link to a handful of names on sporadic ballots across the US is a dumb person’s idea of what “serious electoral effort” is.

          Son, I am disappoint.

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I remember that green party candidate in AZ a few years back had more funding from Republicans lmao.

          • blazera@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yes they are a much smaller political party, that doesnt mean theyre not putting in serious effort

            • JaymesRS@literature.cafeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              If you think a political party (or “serious electoral/political effort”) is just “names on a few ballots,” there is no amount of crayons that someone can use to draw you a picture and get you up to speed.

              Pick a candidate or GoTV organization to volunteer with for a while and come back after that experience.

              • escapesamsara@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Did do that, helped several greens get elected. The green party has more grassroots support than any dem pres candidate in history. You have billionaires, racist soccer moms, aipac, and no real humans on your side.

                • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  The green party has more grassroots support than any dem pres candidate in history.

                  Do you have a source or was this bullshit pulled from your own ass?

        • Glytch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          18 hours ago

          The one guy running for a seat on the Arizona Corporation commission is the only one I saw running in the short of race where the Greens have a chance to affect change. Running for the federal House or Senate isn’t where they should be focusing their efforts until they build a base of support.

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Why not run for the House? A seat has 750k-800k population and quite a few districts are much further left then US average. If a further left candidate would run its those seats, that would force the Democrats to move left.

  • pseudo@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    40 minutes ago

    As a plant watcher, or whatever this is called, I can assure you that this chart will not help you recognised local flora.