• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    It’s not that it should be by population. It’s that the idea of the senate itself is outdated.

    Now the cities are the source of almost all of America’s wealth, power, education, and population, but they are forced to bend the knee to a tiny portion of the country. The whole system is way out of wack.

    Carving up California into more states wouldn’t fix that, as it would still put more power into fewer hands.

    • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I just disagree.

      The Senate is where the States have equal representation regardless of size, that’s the point of it. The House is meant to be where California’s population makes the difference, but the cap needs to be removed, imo.

      Without a Senate, the most populous states drag everyone else around by sheer weight. That’s not sustainable.

      Also, as someone who has experienced life in both rural and urban America, city people have lots of misunderstandings about how people in small communities live and make bad decisions based on those misunderstandings as well. It’s not like country folk have a monopoly on that shit.

      EDIT: Just want to acknowledge the point I think you’re trying to make about minority (often religiously motivated) groups passing laws that affect huge populations in cities where we have to live with each other. I totally get it, just to be clear.