• Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the point of primary and secondary backups if they can be accessed with the same credentials on the same network

    • CrateDane@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      They weren’t normally on the same network, but were accidentally put on the same network during migration.

    • snaptastic@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the correct way to implement it so that it can still be automated? Credentials that can write new backups but not delete existing ones?

  • hunt4peas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 year ago

    Time and time again, data hosting providers are proving that local backups not connected to the internet are way better than storing in the cloud.

  • Max_Power@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Now that you mention fucking incompetence, I need to verify my 3-2-1 backup strategy is correctly implemented. Thanks for the reminder, CloudNordic and AzeroCloud!

  • IonAddis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Danish hosting firms CloudNordic and AzeroCloud have suffered ransomware attacks, causing the loss of the majority of customer data and forcing the hosting providers to shut down all systems, including websites, email, and customer sites.

  • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel really bad for everyone involved - customers and staff. The human cost in this is huge.

    Yes, there’s a lot of criticism of backup strategies here, but I bet most of us who deal with this professionally have knowledge of systems that would also be vulnerable to malicious attack, and that’s only the shortcomings we know about. Audits and pentesting are great, but not infallable and one tiny mistake can expose everything. If we were all as good as we think we are, ransomware wouldn’t be a thing.

    • snailtrail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that people generally overestimate how much money tech companies like this one actually make. Their profits are tiny. A lot of the time, tech companies run on investment money, and can’t actually turn a profit. They wait for the big acquisition or IPO payday. So if you think you’re actually gonna get 100k off them, good luck. Sometimes they’re barely keeping the lights on.

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think they’re aware of that

        Martin Haslund Johansson, the director of Azerocloud and CloudNordic, stated that he does not expect customers to be left with them when the recovery is finally completed.

        • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          The customers are already lost:

          1. pay the expensive ransom, if the bad actor gives them the decryption key, customers are relieved but still pissed, will take the data and move to somewhere else with a big FO. Go out of business.

          2. don’t pay the ransom, customers are pissed and move to somewhere else with a big FO. Go out of business.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you fuck up that badly you shouldn’t be allowed to operate in that industry.