Politico

  • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my ideal world, we’d have a full carbon tax as well as a vehicle weight tax, and we’d use part of that to fund more electrified public transit (e.g., trains, trams, trolleybuses) and bike infrastructure. Plus we need to actually legalize dense, walkable urbanism. The zoning codes and parking minimums in North America make it literally illegal to build anything dense, walkable, and transit-oriented across almost all the urban land, resulting in miles and miles of government-mandated sprawl.

    The future of sustainable urban is truly in public transit and micromobility – car dependency just doesn’t make any sense in cities, as no amount of electric cars can make up for the harm caused by sprawling, car-dependent land use. Electric cars are obviously less bad than ICE cars, but just swapping out ICE cars for electric is not actually financially, socially, or environmentally sustainable.

    We should still have electric cars for the use cases (e.g., rural areas) for which you truly do need them, but the vehicle weight arms race (especially for trucks and SUVs) is getting out of control and we need the electric cars we would still have to be much smaller and lighter like this. Fewer electric hummers, more electric kei trucks, more electric trains, more electric bikes.

      • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I am a Republican and I hate their stance on electric cars, walkable cities, etc. For some reason, the party has taken an ignorant and hard stance against electric.

        Could you look at other stances too? It’s not just this.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did you, self-declared “very moderate” Republican, vote for Trump either time?

            Because, historically, Hillary and Biden would be considered very moderate Republicans.

          • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            • No exceptions for rape and incest.
            • Supporting 1/6
            • Observation of them being worse for the economy after investigating state of economy for decades
            • Closing of majority-black voting poll locations.

            And this is a short list